Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Hmmm ... mine is going to have fun with me if they have anything similar. I wonder, is Namibia considered south Africa or west Africa? Maybe the fact that I was there 2 flipping years ago might make the point moot?Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo
While I suppose it's possible for there to be asymptomatic human carriers of Ebola, it's probably not very likely.
I'd be far more concerned that the disease might get a foot hold in a non-human carrier species like dogs, cats, mice, etc.
If that happens, then it's possible we'd never be rid of it, because there would be a continuous reservoir of the disease out in the wild.
Last edited by Justin; 10-27-2014 at 09:27.
Carriers ala Typhoid Mary? I agree, probably not very likely, however what you're missing is that the people may have the disease and be asymptomatic when tested or allowed to travel then become symptomatic later. Given the severity of the outcome, I'm not so sure I'm willing to trust the CDC's claim that the disease is absolutely not transmissible until the victim is symptomatic and that translates to risk. Biological processes tend not to be binary in nature -- there's no magic switch from non-communicable to communicable.
As we progress into cold-and-flu season, I think quarantine for high risk individuals is both justified and smart -- the fact there's probably a statistical correlation with opposition from the Obama Administration and the wisdom of the policy just adds weight toward quarantine policies IMO.
This is a hard one for me. On one side this person didn't break any laws and is an American citizen. If she didn't break any laws, the government is infringing on her freedom if they forcibly quarantine her.
On the other side, I believe it is the fedgov responsibility to protect our borders and that includes keeping infectious diseases out.
Non-citizens? I have no problem with the FedGov quarantining any that are potential carriers. They don't get the same rights as citizens.
Is this person stupid? Hell yeah. Selfish? Yup. Criminal? Nope, at least not yet. If this person turns out to be infected and infects others, then yes, that turns criminal. Should the Gov be able to lock her up because her stupidity MIGHT hurt others? I think my opinion is falling on the side of "no" on this one. A little too Minority Report for me... even though I fully agree that it's attitudes like this person's that will be responsible for any possible future outbreak on our soil.
IMO, the proper way to handle this is to shutdown commercial flights. Then we don't have to worry about infringing on the finer points of quarantine vs freedom. If American doctors want to fly to Africa to help...cool. They can charter flights but only after they sign a legal document agreeing to be quarantined on their return.
^This.
http://disciplejourney.com
“Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher
CIPCIP
Reckless endangerment maybe?
Realistically, there is no way to stop somebody that is intent on getting into the US.
Perhaps. May be hard to argue that after the negative test though.
At our present border security level, agreed.
20 million illegal aliens agree!
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
I would assume these health workers are signing some sort of work agreement before going overseas. Seeing they are going to ebola central to work directly with ebola patients, I am surprised that some sort of quarantine requirement would be a part of the work agreement. In that case, they would have agreed to it before going. Has nothing to do with citizenship.
Now the disclaimer. I have no idea how new age, idealistic, whatever, the organization is that these people are signing up to assist. I thought it was Docs-without-borders, but I don't know much about them either. Maybe no agreement is executed as a part of the work?
14 . Always carry a change of underwear.
I'm sure they do sign some sort of liability form with their employers, however their employer doesn't have any legal authority to forcibly quarantine them even if they do sign something.
The employer could not allow them to come to work for 21 days. Or require them to get tests before returning to work. Etc. But an employer can not force someone to stay home or in a isolation ward at a hospital in quarantine.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote