Close
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 61
  1. #31
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clublights View Post
    Too bad the congress critters baring of retirement of the A-10 has nothing to do with protecting troops as much as it has to do with keeping money flowing in home districts.
    Mmmm ... where are you getting this from? It's not like the A-10 is being produced anymore.

  2. #32
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    The A-10 is better suited to CAS to protect our guys on the ground. The F-35 on the other hand has been a tremendous waste of money.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  3. #33
    Varmiteer speedysst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Meeker, CO
    Posts
    658

    Default

    Maybe we could just buy the Chinese copy of the F-35. I mean, they stole the plans and we know it flies since they did a demonstration when Obama was there.
    An Islamic terrorist is a lot like king salmon. Life is great until the SEALs show up.

    "Artillery lends dignity to what might otherwise be a vulgar brawl” - Frederick the Great

  4. #34
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Mmmm ... where are you getting this from? It's not like the A-10 is being produced anymore.
    A-10 bases are not F-35 bases .... so if the airmen move to F-35 bases for training there will not be personnel and the money they spend at the former A-10 bases .

  5. #35
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clublights View Post
    A-10 bases are not F-35 bases .... so if the airmen move to F-35 bases for training there will not be personnel and the money they spend at the former A-10 bases .
    That's so thin I could use it for a window. When we roll out new aircraft to replace existing aircraft with the same mission, the new aircraft go to existing units while the personnel are upgraded to the new platforms.

    I understand the desire to be skeptical of Congress but sometimes they really are interested in things like preserving capabilities that work.

  6. #36
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    That's so thin I could use it for a window. When we roll out new aircraft to replace existing aircraft with the same mission, the new aircraft go to existing units while the personnel are upgraded to the new platforms.

    I understand the desire to be skeptical of Congress but sometimes they really are interested in things like preserving capabilities that work.

    Except it is not thin in the slightest ..


    Current A-10 Bases:
    Davis Monthan
    Moody
    splattering of ANG's

    First 3 F-35 bases :

    Hill
    Eglin
    Burlington .
    Davis Monthan


    If you don't think politics plays into that you don't remember the BRAC of the 90's that had nothing to do with saving the pentagon money and everything to do with keeping bases open in home districts.

  7. #37
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bailey, CO
    Posts
    1,511

    Default

    so...decide it by a head to head competition, 2 A-10s vs 3 F-35s, UNDER 1500 feet. Then the A-10 can be put back into production because there will never be an equal to the Hog in CAS.

  8. #38
    Machine Gunner flogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    MORRISON, CO
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    I read they are going to try an A-10 for weather/storm chasing. Probably a good platform and ready to take a beating..

  9. #39
    Drives the Blue French Bus RMAC757's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    1,454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackford76 View Post
    so...decide it by a head to head competition, 2 A-10s vs 3 F-35s, UNDER 1500 feet. Then the A-10 can be put back into production because there will never be an equal to the Hog in CAS.
    The A-10 would smash everything in sight, the F-35 would turn the lights out and shut down enemy defenses. I can say this, there is no way they will reopen the A-10 line. Most of the airframe tooling probably doesn't exsist anymore. The airplane will unfortunately be retired eventually. The airplane is extremely effective against a third world nation but wouldn't last long against someone with modern air defenses. The Sniper and LITENING pod brought it about as far as it can go. The AF wants to move in the direction of Cyber fighting with up linked data. The A-10 doesn't fit that role. Sad, but it's been a tried and true warrior.

  10. #40
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RMAC757 View Post
    The A-10 would smash everything in sight, the F-35 would turn the lights out and shut down enemy defenses. I can say this, there is no way they will reopen the A-10 line. Most of the airframe tooling probably doesn't exsist anymore. The airplane will unfortunately be retired eventually. The airplane is extremely effective against a third world nation but wouldn't last long against someone with modern air defenses. The Sniper and LITENING pod brought it about as far as it can go. The AF wants to move in the direction of Cyber fighting with up linked data. The A-10 doesn't fit that role. Sad, but it's been a tried and true warrior.
    And as sad to say I agree. The biggest thing in my mind is that nothing strikes fear into the enemy and nothing other than the A-10 boosts morale to the troops on the ground. I see us fighting the third world threat for a long time.

    Just the sound of one brings big smiles to troops on the ground. It is just one of those intangibles that is understood by many but they do not make the case. The biggest point that a few had the balls to say it was when the Army said "if you don't want it we will take it" years ago. Some forget that it used to be the "Army air corps"

    Just thought from an old guy that loves the A-10.
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •