Ferguson

[Bailey Guns]

I don't think "all lives matter" is a liberal platitude... like someone else said, then they wouldn't be killing unborn babies
Liberals are fighting AGAINST those that say "All lives matter": http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julia-...b_6223072.html

No, the liberal BLACK author of that piece you quoted is fighting against people saying "all lives matter" because she feels whitey doesn't really believe it. In other words, she's tired of hearing it as well, because she doesn't believe it's said sincerely and it's overused. Which is exactly what makes it a platitude. No, she would prefer people said only "black lives matter".

But, if all "black lives matter", why aren't blacks in an uproar over the killings of blacks by blacks in inner cities like Chicago and Detroit? It's because of blatant hypocrisy, that's why. "Black lives matter" only when they're killed by white police officers, apparently. She never mentions the hundreds, perhaps thousands (I don't know the number), of blacks killed by blacks in the hood and elsewhere. And "black lives matter" certainly isn't the case when the black person killed is a police officer: Officer Kevin Jordan was killed by a white man earlier this year in Georgia. I don't recall ever hearing his name mentioned by Obama (guess Officer Jordan didn't look like a son Obama might've had) or Holder. I don't recall Sharpton or Jackson mentioning his name either. As someone else stated, apparently Officer Jordan was on the wrong side of the Thin Blue Line.

The way I see "ALL lives matter" is just that- and as soon as you are threatening someone else's life with your actions, you forfeit your right- because you don't respect their right to live, you forfeit yours. That is the right to self defence (or defence of others).

I find that statement quite contradictory. So, apparently, all lives DON'T matter if you're willing to kill in self-defense. Which is basically what I said except that I said I could kill a terrorist and not feel any remorse whatsoever...because to me the life of a terrorist doesn't matter at all.

[RMAC757]

No, the liberal BLACK author of that piece you quoted is fighting against people saying "all lives matter" because she feels whitey doesn't really believe it. In other words, she's tired of hearing it as well, because she doesn't believe it's said sincerely and it's overused. Which is exactly what makes it a platitude. No, she would prefer people said only "black lives matter".

But, if all "black lives matter", why aren't blacks in an uproar over the killings of blacks by blacks in inner cities like Chicago and Detroit? It's because of blatant hypocrisy, that's why. "Black lives matter" only when they're killed by white police officers, apparently. She never mentions the hundreds, perhaps thousands (I don't know the number), of blacks killed by blacks in the hood and elsewhere. And "black lives matter" certainly isn't the case when the black person killed is a police officer: Officer Kevin Jordan was killed by a white man earlier this year in Georgia. I don't recall ever hearing his name mentioned by Obama (guess Officer Jordan didn't look like a son Obama might've had) or Holder. I don't recall Sharpton or Jackson mentioning his name either. As someone else stated, apparently Officer Jordan was on the wrong side of the Thin Blue Line.



I find that statement quite contradictory. So, apparently, all lives DON'T matter if you're willing to kill in self-defense. Which is basically what I said except that I said I could kill a terrorist and not feel any remorse whatsoever...because to me the life of a terrorist doesn't matter at all.

You are one angry dude.