I was talking to a person about this new topic over the weekend, and he was concerned that this was setting up a fight over states' rights versus federal oversight. The problem I explained is simply we are not a democracy, but a republic. What's the difference? We are a nation of laws (republic) and not a nation of majority rules (democracy). If the laws are unconstitutional then we look to the courts for relief, otherwise we change the laws. To make a state constitutional right (amendment 64) in direct conflict with a federal law poses an interesting fight at the federal level.

Let the games begin.