Close
Page 4 of 15 FirstFirst 12345678914 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 147
  1. #31
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    When has a form 4473 been used to keep a criminal from obtaining a gun?

    Requiring government permission and paying a fee to exercise a right is wrong in so many ways.
    FIFY
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  2. #32
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    FIFY
    I'll agree with this. Colorado NICS was created with the promise that it would never require an extra fee during the transaction, and that promise was broken with this law.

    As for Eric's question, background checks have stopped people from getting firearms. Hell, I saw it happen last year at The Firing Line.

  3. #33
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eastern Wyoming
    Posts
    574

    Default

    im trying to remember...what do the liberals think about background checks and fees to vote? how about background checks to peaceably assemble? how about background checks and fees to murder babies? with liberals its all off limits except for with guns.


    maybe a background check and fees before someone slides across the border and pops out a baby? maybe a background check and fee for muslims wanting to go to mosque?

    its funny none of it is ok, except to limit the 2a.
    Last edited by HBARleatherneck; 01-10-2015 at 18:36.

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    Seriously, do you really believe there is not a database being compiled on all the private sales guns that had NO paperwork on them before??? So using your logic why worry about the mag ban? Have you heard of mag confiscations yet? Wake TF up!!! BOTH laws are bad, but the worst of the two is the BG law that puts thousands, perhaps millions of non papered, not traceable guns on the radar screen.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    Besides that one movie, where has the 4473 been used to confiscate firearms?

  5. #35
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HBARleatherneck View Post
    im trying to remember...what do the liberals think about background checks and fees to vote? how about background checks to peaceably assemble? how about background checks and fees to murder babies? with liberals its all off limits except for with guns.


    maybe a background check and fees before someone slides across the border and pops out a baby? maybe a background check and fee for muslims wanting to go to mosque?

    its funny none of it is ok, except to limit the 2a.
    You need a permit to peaceably assemble.

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Seriously, do you really believe there is not a database being compiled on all the private sales guns that had NO paperwork on them before??? So using your logic why worry about the mag ban? Have you heard of mag confiscations yet? Wake TF up!!! BOTH laws are bad, but the worst of the two is the BG law that puts thousands, perhaps millions of non papered, not traceable guns on the radar screen.
    Do you not believe that there is a database with you on it because of anything you've posted?

  6. #36
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eastern Wyoming
    Posts
    574

    Default

    no, actually in most cases you dont. in larger groups and in some municipalities, yes. but, what about a background check?

  7. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    Yeah, and read me that sentence about the "permit" in the bill of rights.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    You need a permit to peaceably assemble.



    Do you not believe that there is a database with you on it because of anything you've posted?

  8. #38
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Answer me this:

    Do you think a felon should be allowed to own a gun? To vote? Should someone under investigation for making threats against their spouse be allowed to purchase a firearm?

  9. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    So now you are afraid of a database from postings on the internet, but not from backround check forms? If you don't want to discuss or defend your silly statements then don't post them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    You need a permit to peaceably assemble.



    Do you not believe that there is a database with you on it because of anything you've posted?

  10. #40
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    Answer me this:

    Do you think a felon should be allowed to own a gun? To vote? Should someone under investigation for making threats against their spouse be allowed to purchase a firearm?
    Yes.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •