Close
Page 11 of 15 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131415 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 147
  1. #101
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    I have been trying to figure out the 'best' answer on the BGC's. I don't think any of us want to sell to a felon, terrorist, etc, which is the point of the law. That is where I do believe the 90% statistic commonly used. The problem stems from the registration that many (not all) feel is the real reason behind the BGC's. What needs to happen is that there is a way that a seller can check the staus of the buyer without the required SN. That could be (relatively) simply setup, I would think. Maybe something like a "Go-No Go" based on a drivers license number. There are going to be abuses of any system and I can think of a few with this one. The point is a full repeal.... Gonna be hard (not impossible). If there is a well thought out alternative it has a better chance to succeed.
    How about an iphone or android app doorway into NICS?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  2. #102
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Just realize that the important Colorado law to get rid of is the BG check, not the magazine ban. That one should be a secondary concern.
    The problem is that the Democrats tied it to a $10 fee that the CBI gets to keep. They diverted budgetary funds away from CBI to other pet projects, since background checks provide funding. They ain't never giving that money stream back.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  3. #103
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    This!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    I have been trying to figure out the 'best' answer on the BGC's. I don't think any of us want to sell to a felon, terrorist, etc, which is the point of the law. That is where I do believe the 90% statistic commonly used. The problem stems from the registration that many (not all) feel is the real reason behind the BGC's. What needs to happen is that there is a way that a seller can check the staus of the buyer without the required SN. That could be (relatively) simply setup, I would think. Maybe something like a "Go-No Go" based on a drivers license number. There are going to be abuses of any system and I can think of a few with this one. The point is a full repeal.... Gonna be hard (not impossible). If there is a well thought out alternative it has a better chance to succeed.

  4. #104
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,965

    Default

    I was just thinking about a P2P app that the buyer with a valid state issued DL could use to gen a one-time single use code to give the seller. The seller could then verify the buyer is GTG.

    All you would need to do is keep the code for verification if there was ever an issue.
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  5. #105
    Escaped From New York zteknik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    6,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    I was just thinking about a P2P app that the buyer with a valid state issued DL could use to gen a one-time single use code to give the seller. The seller could then verify the buyer is GTG.

    All you would need to do is keep the code for verification if there was ever an issue.
    Too simple,not enough red tape to justify the budget of unnecessary workers...
    FHUGETABOUDIT!!!

  6. #106
    Grand Master Know It All newracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Timnath
    Posts
    4,586

    Default


  7. #107
    Varmiteer Honey Badger282.8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Salina, KS
    Posts
    520

    Default

    How about we just make a firearms endorsement on state issued IDs? Make it an opt-out program so you don't have to worry about a registry because having the endorsement doesn't mean you are trying to buy a gun. No serial numbers or type of gun attached to any personal information, automatic firewall to a gun registry. Then when you go to purchase a firearm you only need to show the ID.
    Last edited by Honey Badger282.8; 01-11-2015 at 19:56.

  8. #108
    Varmiteer GunsRBadMMMMKay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    551

    Default

    How about we just stop worrying about controlling what free people can purchase and own, and direct the energy into punishing those who commit the crimes? (Maybe starting on the governing level LOL) I don't personally feel that any bgc or registration laws stop crimes, they only help create more criminals - and leave the door open for the underlying system/registration/etc to be exploited in the future.

  9. #109
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GunsRBadMMMMKay View Post
    How about we just stop worrying about controlling what free people can purchase and own, and direct the energy into punishing those who commit the crimes? (Maybe starting on the governing level LOL) I don't personally feel that any bgc or registration laws stop crimes, they only help create more criminals - and leave the door open for the underlying system/registration/etc to be exploited in the future.
    THIS. Because BGCs simply do not work. Criminals STILL get as many guns as they want and guns are not kept out of the hands of mentally ill people either. Keep in mind that EVERY mass shooter that got their guns legally went through BGCs. At best they are a waste of time and money and at worst they're a tool that can be used to undermine law abiding gun ownership.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  10. #110
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    The problem is that the Democrats tied it to a $10 fee that the CBI gets to keep. They diverted budgetary funds away from CBI to other pet projects, since background checks provide funding. They ain't never giving that money stream back.

    Is there any reason for the CBI to even be involved? Can FFLs directly access the federal system that CBI uses?

    Cut the middleman, end the fee. No need to have extra non-essential employees if we can do without them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •