Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1? It clearly states this is only for Handguns.
It is important to note that only projectiles that meet thestatutory definition of “armor piercing” – i.e., those made out of the specific listed materials thatmay be used in a handgun – are subject to the statutory restrictions. As a result, manufacturersare, and will continue to be, free to manufacture projectiles from non-restricted materials,completely independent of the application of this framework or any exemptionsThis looks more aimed at 5.7x28 since they have been wanting to go after that for years and since it is actual handgun ammo.[L]et me make clear what this bill does not do. Our legislation would not limit the availability of standard rifle ammunition with armor-piercing capability. We recognizethat soft body armor is not intended to stop high powered rifle cartridges. Time andagain Congressman Biaggi and I have stressed that only bullets capable of penetratingbody armor and designed to be fired from a handgun would be banned; rifle ammunitionwould not be covered.
Ummm still bad but wrong ammo. Somebody is trying to start another
Looks like it might be working







Reply With Quote

