Close
Results 1 to 10 of 398

Thread: M855/ss109

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1? It clearly states this is only for Handguns.

    It is important to note that only projectiles that meet thestatutory definition of “armor piercing” – i.e., those made out of the specific listed materials thatmay be used in a handgun are subject to the statutory restrictions. As a result, manufacturersare, and will continue to be, free to manufacture projectiles from non-restricted materials,completely independent of the application of this framework or any exemptions
    [L]et me make clear what this bill does not do. Our legislation would not limit the availability of standard rifle ammunition with armor-piercing capability. We recognizethat soft body armor is not intended to stop high powered rifle cartridges. Time andagain Congressman Biaggi and I have stressed that only bullets capable of penetratingbody armor and designed to be fired from a handgun would be banned; rifle ammunitionwould not be covered.
    This looks more aimed at 5.7x28 since they have been wanting to go after that for years and since it is actual handgun ammo.

    Ummm still bad but wrong ammo. Somebody is trying to start another

    Looks like it might be working
    Last edited by Hound; 02-14-2015 at 19:21.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

  2. #2
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1?
    Ummm still bad but wrong ammo. Somebody is trying to start another

    Looks like it might be working
    Have you actually read the article, pages 14/15 might be of particular interest...

    http://www.atf.gov/sites/default/fil...g_purposes.pdf

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
    Have you actually read the article, pages 14/15 might be of particular interest...

    http://www.atf.gov/sites/default/fil...g_purposes.pdf
    Ya, Page 15 is the capper but it makes no sense since the law clearly states handguns. AR15 pistols are not handguns (they even acknowledge this in the paper), concealable, not being used in mass cops shooting and have always been recognized as such. They are looking for comments and as 41P has shown we can change things. With an R Congress and threat of 2016 gun owner uprising (that has swung previous elections) I think this will be put off until after 2016 if there is enough push back.
    Last edited by Hound; 02-14-2015 at 19:57.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

  4. #4
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    Ya, Page 15 is the capper but it makes no sense
    When the ATF starts to make sense, y'all let me know

  5. #5
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,469
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1? It clearly states this is only for Handguns.
    No, it clearly states:

    It is important to note that only projectiles that meet the statutory definition of "armor piercing", i.e., those made out of the specific listed materials that may be used in a handgun are subject to the statutory restrictions.
    Pages 14 and 15 clearly explain the ATF is withdrawing the previous exemption for 5.56mm ammunition, specifically M855 and SS109 variants, and further states it will no longer be available to civilians by manufacturers, retailers and/or importers. It's not ambiguous at all. Their reasoning specifically states this is because the ammunition can be used in a handgun version of AR-15 style rifles that weren't widely available (if at all) when the exemption for M855 and SS109 variants of 5.56mm ammo were granted.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  6. #6
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1? It clearly states this is only for Handguns.




    This looks more aimed at 5.7x28 since they have been wanting to go after that for years and since it is actual handgun ammo.

    Ummm still bad but wrong ammo. Somebody is trying to start another

    Looks like it might be working
    The spirit of the original law passed by Congress back in the day was that this only applied to ammo originally designed for and manufactured as a handgun cartridge. The BATF has twisted the law to apply to any ammo that can be fired from a "handgun" regardless of the original manufactured intent of the ammo in question. Under the wording of the original law none of this ammo including the 7.62x39, 5.45x39 that has been banned would have ever been included. Now that people make handgun versions of AKs and ARs the BATF has decided on their own authority to twist the law to proclaim that these rifle cartridges are now handgun cartridges.

  7. #7
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Well put.

    Quote Originally Posted by def90 View Post
    The spirit of the original law passed by Congress back in the day was that this only applied to ammo originally designed for and manufactured as a handgun cartridge. The BATF has twisted the law to apply to any ammo that can be fired from a "handgun" regardless of the original manufactured intent of the ammo in question. Under the wording of the original law none of this ammo including the 7.62x39, 5.45x39 that has been banned would have ever been included. Now that people make handgun versions of AKs and ARs the BATF has decided on their own authority to twist the law to proclaim that these rifle cartridges are now handgun cartridges.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •