Close
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Eh.... not entirely. Seeing as how they were going beyond the scope of a simple security screening (cops have been brought up on charges during pat-downs and searches before), in this particular case, I could easily see how these TSA agents could be charged with unlawful sexual contact. They did admit to it, and also state they had a plan in place to do so. This satisfies the requirements for culpability and they should be charged.

    Like you said, Skip, the fact that some out there want these dolts to be armed is a very frightening proposition.
    Yup and I think they're admission was based on the belief they are immune. Ron Paul tried to repeal that immunity with a Traveler's Dignity Act or something a few years ago. It failed to pass...

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr6416

    American Traveller Dignity Act of 2010 - Prohibits any law of the United States from being construed to confer immunity for a federal employee or agency, or any individual or entity that receives federal funds, who subjects an individual to any physical contact, x-rays, or millimeter waves, or aids in the creation of or views a representation of any part of an individual's body covered by clothing, as a condition for such individual to be in an airport or to fly in an aircraft.
    But what is also interesting (to me) is I could not find the specific law(s) that permitted TSA junk checking. Plenty of decisions on the how the Fourth Amendment does not protect us from groping when deemed reasonable. Making it a game to check out "cute guys" obviously isn't reasonable. But I couldn't find anything that elevated that to a crime.

    I think you'll see this story die a quick death with no charges. I'm actually really surprised it was reported in the first place. Gov doesn't like to admit to its over-reach(around).

    In a perfect world we have real homeland security--no need for DHS.

  2. #2
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Yup and I think they're admission was based on the belief they are immune. Ron Paul tried to repeal that immunity with a Traveler's Dignity Act or something a few years ago. It failed to pass...

    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr6416



    But what is also interesting (to me) is I could not find the specific law(s) that permitted TSA junk checking. Plenty of decisions on the how the Fourth Amendment does not protect us from groping when deemed reasonable. Making it a game to check out "cute guys" obviously isn't reasonable. But I couldn't find anything that elevated that to a crime.

    I think you'll see this story die a quick death with no charges. I'm actually really surprised it was reported in the first place. Gov doesn't like to admit to its over-reach(around).

    In a perfect world we have real homeland security--no need for DHS.
    You are an excellent candidate to suggest watching "Please Remove Your Shoes", it's a great documentary (was on Netflix some time ago, not sure if now or not) made with a former FAA Security officer who used to test the security of different airports and he discusses the changes made due to the failures of Pre-911 screening. Really well done and proves the holes they had could have been fixed but bureaucracy screwed that all up and gave birth to the TSA and DHS. Hindsight is 20/20, but when they were pointing out glaring problems back in the late 90's it shows a history of dropping the ball and failing to act.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  3. #3
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    You are an excellent candidate to suggest watching "Please Remove Your Shoes", it's a great documentary (was on Netflix some time ago, not sure if now or not) made with a former FAA Security officer who used to test the security of different airports and he discusses the changes made due to the failures of Pre-911 screening. Really well done and proves the holes they had could have been fixed but bureaucracy screwed that all up and gave birth to the TSA and DHS. Hindsight is 20/20, but when they were pointing out glaring problems back in the late 90's it shows a history of dropping the ball and failing to act.

    Very worth the watch ...

    And one to rememberer.. the TSA has not caught one terrorist period. nada zip never happened.

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner KestrelBike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    2,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    You are an excellent candidate to suggest watching "Please Remove Your Shoes", it's a great documentary (was on Netflix some time ago, not sure if now or not) made with a former FAA Security officer who used to test the security of different airports and he discusses the changes made due to the failures of Pre-911 screening. Really well done and proves the holes they had could have been fixed but bureaucracy screwed that all up and gave birth to the TSA and DHS. Hindsight is 20/20, but when they were pointing out glaring problems back in the late 90's it shows a history of dropping the ball and failing to act.
    I looked but it's not on netflix anymore : (

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •