Denver ...never ceases to amaze me.
Denver ...never ceases to amaze me.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ
My general feeling is Denver is doing everything in its power to become Ferguson. By the way the Denver Post reports stories they cannot wait for some kind of police brutality to set this city on fire and the police commish is just enabling it now.
Police should be able to protect themselves by whatever means necessary whenever they feel like their lives are in danger.
This is probably a response to the shooting where that girl who stole a car tried to run over a cop who shot her and her family made a big stink about it. (Sorry if thats already been said)
"A wise man recognizes that although he cannot always control what happens to him, he can always control how he reacts to his failures. As long as he keeps his faith in God and in himself, nothing can permanently defeat him."
Denver needs to pass a law stating that it is illegal to run over cops, then I am sure this will all stop.
/sarcasm
...that is the level of stupid that Denver has become.
I guess I'm confused what changed from before. Can someone break it down for me?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Listen to the statement from DPD's chief of police in the video I linked in the original post.
he basically states that " under the new policy, unless officers are being shot at from the vehicle accelerating at them, the officers are no longer allowed to shoot at the vehicle."
My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.
Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?
Pati, improbe et vince
I did not listen to the video, but from what I read, it seemed like an officer in fear of their life could still shoot at a moving vehicle. That seemed to be pretty much the same as before. I get that they are trying to appear proactive, but none of this really makes sense to me. An officer is in danger or is not in danger, and the responsibility to articulate as much after the fact rests on the officer. I don't understand how the presence of a vehicle changes that. I guess since I'm not DPD, I don't really have to lose any sleep over it; just like I wouldn't lose any sleep over it if I WERE DPD.
"There are no finger prints under water."
More bending over backwards and putting LEO into impossible situations for those in society that fail to obey because they know there will be support for their lawlessness and bad choices.
Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.
Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft
Just another example of how liberals are clueless.
So we can get rid of that whole crime of "vehicular assault," right?