Which [the public option] is equally (if not more) unsustainable.
Where do they get the value (used to be money) to pay for all of this? A VAT? Higher payroll/income taxes? Sure, tax "the rich" (except Dems) and watch unemployment spike. It's a zero-sum game with collectivists.
I think a lot of Bernie voters know this but mistakenly think they will get to pick winners and losers.
I don't really see a problem with it, honestly. Treating healthcare as a for-profit enterprise will only hurt the consumer, which is everyone. From the surgery costs to the drug costs, there is profit that needs to be made at every level, which drives up the cost greatly.
Canada has basic medical care as single payer, with voluntary procedures (typically the most expensive procedures) not covered and subject to additional costs/coverage under private plans.
I'm going to say this now, because I know it'll be accused of me if I don't. Hillary is not to be trusted, and Bernie Sanders is living in a dream world and his plans are not fiscally feasible.
Last edited by Ridge; 10-21-2015 at 22:56.
I think that the much bigger problem is that with current health "insurance," people are completely insulated from the actual price of procedures and don't/can't price shop. Voluntary medical procedures like lasik and plastic surgery are for sure run on a for profit basis and the prices have been dropping while procedures have been getting better.
I wish I could remember the website, but there is a place where you can submit a procedure you need doing, and not only do they price shop for you, but actually pay you to go to the places that are less expensive. The payment comes directly from your provider, who is enthusiastic about people not blindly spending money that mostly falls to the provider.
"There are no finger prints under water."