Close
Results 1 to 10 of 61

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner Martinjmpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    So I guess I'm the only one who thinks shooting at drones is a monumentally stupid idea?

    I can think of at least 2 reasons why this is dumb.

    First, when you fire a gun you are legally responsible for where that projectile goes. Maybe it goes into the drone, or maybe it goes into someone's front window, either way you are 100% liable. Shooting at flying objects is not easy even under the best circumstances. I hope he's using bird shot because a buckshot pellet can travel quite a distance and still pack a punch.

    Second, assuming your aim is true and you hit the drone, again, YOU are now 100% responsible for what happens to it. Maybe it just falls to the ground, but then again, maybe it goes out of control and hits someone's home, a car on the highway, passing pedestrian, etc.

    I guess I don't get the tinfoil-hatted paranoia about drones. Using an ominous term like 'drones' makes it sound like they are predator drones flying over us with Hellfire missiles ready to shoot at innocent citizens at the press of a button, or heartless Terminators forever looking for Sarah Connor.

    OTOH, Calling them "remote control airplanes" (which is exactly what they are) makes them sound more like a toy (which, again, is what they are.)
    Martin

    If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.

  2. #2
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Martinjmpr View Post
    OTOH, Calling them "remote control airplanes" (which is exactly what they are) makes them sound more like a toy (which, again, is what they are.)
    Hey, let's make peeping Toms with video recorders a protected class.

    When they have cameras on them and are looking in your windows or flying over your private property, they cease to be a "toy".

    7 1/2 or 8 shot is enough to take out a drone and isn't going to hurt anybody as it falls back to the ground.
    Last edited by Gman; 10-28-2015 at 17:29.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  3. #3
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    Hey, let's make peeping Toms with video recorders a protected class.

    When they have cameras on them and are looking in your windows or flying over your private property, they cease to be a "toy".

    7 1/2 or 8 shot is enough to take out a drone and isn't going to hurt anybody as it falls back to the ground.

    Id disagree on that last part. My good hunting partner had a guy in his group pheasant hunting almost lose his eye last year when he was a blocker and caught a piece of shot just under his eye which embedded. One more reason to wear eye protection
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •