If there was a non-firearm method of downing the drone, the guy might have used that instead. A hose only has so much reach though.
If there was a non-firearm method of downing the drone, the guy might have used that instead. A hose only has so much reach though.
"There are no finger prints under water."
hmm, directional EMP or microwave pulse? fry the electronics, and they can't even say it was you that brought it down...
or a less destructive option- an RF jammer- they most commonly use unregulated 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz
The simplest jammer is simply an amp for the frequency in question- run in open-loop (antenna on input and output)
This creates a feedback loop that creates so much noise the signal is lost...
Use of directional antennas would limit the impact to what you pointed it at... likely it would go into a "return home" mode when it loses signal.
I'd say someone could make a business creating these devices, but they're not really legal... so the business would be black market.
Last edited by 68Charger; 10-28-2015 at 16:35.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...