Close
Results 1 to 10 of 61

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If there was a non-firearm method of downing the drone, the guy might have used that instead. A hose only has so much reach though.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #2
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    If there was a non-firearm method of downing the drone, the guy might have used that instead. A hose only has so much reach though.
    hmm, directional EMP or microwave pulse? fry the electronics, and they can't even say it was you that brought it down...

    or a less destructive option- an RF jammer- they most commonly use unregulated 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz
    The simplest jammer is simply an amp for the frequency in question- run in open-loop (antenna on input and output)
    This creates a feedback loop that creates so much noise the signal is lost...

    Use of directional antennas would limit the impact to what you pointed it at... likely it would go into a "return home" mode when it loses signal.

    I'd say someone could make a business creating these devices, but they're not really legal... so the business would be black market.
    Last edited by 68Charger; 10-28-2015 at 16:35.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •