I am anxiously waiting.....

[Kraven251]

That video is AMAZING!

[Aloha_Shooter]

Yeah, I heard Peters on my way into work. He didn't hold back and poor Stuart Varney had to warn him on his language.

[Ronin13]

Those in CA weren't on any list.

Bingo!! And even if this were the law it would not have stopped SB.

Straw-man, plain and simple. Obummer wants more that good ol "feel good" "common sense" [insert liberal buzzword here] gun control. Creating a problem where it doesn't exist. The No-fly list law wouldn't have stopped this, as both weren't on it. Also, they used "evil assault weapons" that weren't legal in CA... So tell me again, liberals, what law would have stopped this? We all know and understand, the answer is a resounding NONE! And did I watch the speech last night? No. If I wanted to see someone tell a bunch of BS and lies, I'd go talk to one of our in-custody defendants at work.

[Great-Kazoo]

And did I watch the speech last night? No.

Well i did. Honestly i feel he did a decent job. OUTSIDE the usual gun rhetoric . Hell, He actually said Terrorism numerous times, without choking on his words. It was painful for him to say TERRORISM but he did.

[sellersm]

M.D. Creekmore's response: http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/an...can-drop-dead/

[sellersm]

And there's this: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...m-groups.shtml

And this: https://theintercept.com/2014/07/23/blacklisted/

[Irving]

And did I watch the speech last night? No.

Well i did. Honestly i feel he did a decent job. OUTSIDE the usual gun rhetoric . Hell, He actually said Terrorism numerous times, without choking on his words. It was painful for him to say TERRORISM but he did.

Agreed. Whether you agree with him or like him or not, he's got to be just as sick of talking about guns as we are hearing about them. If he had jumped onto the healthy eating bandwagon with his wife, he might have less gray hair now.

[Dave_L]

I'm curious if his sudden use of the word terrorism is linked to other plans he has. Somehow link that with "assault" weapon ownership or pro 2a speech and use it as reason to confiscate guns in the name of domestic terrorism. Just a little tin foil to start the week.

https://www.aclu.org/how-usa-patriot...stic-terrorism

[Irving]

I think it's probably more likely that with the San Bernardino thing, there just isn't anything else to call it anymore that people will buy. He can't afford to call it anything else when EVERYONE else is calling it terrorism; end of term or not.

[Great-Kazoo]

I think it's probably more likely that with the San Bernardino thing, there just isn't anything else to call it anymore that people will buy. He can't afford to call it anything else when EVERYONE else is calling it terrorism; end of term or not.

He could. However it would put HRC in an interesting position regarding her stance on terrorism. She supports increased efforts regarding support & military personal overseas, she alienates more of the left. She comes out disagreeing with BHO, she knows Jarret would really shovel her dirt in public.