Close
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: ISIS Primer

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner Kraven251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    Once again we are fighting an enemy we do not fully understand with a command structure that cannot make the decisions to defeat them.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ

  2. #2
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,823
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraven251 View Post
    Once again we are fighting an enemy we do not fully understand with a command structure that cannot make the decisions to defeat them.
    Well, Putin did say yesterday that he could put nuclear warheads on cruise missiles against ISIS, but hoped that it would never be necessary.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner KestrelBike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    2,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Me too. Wanted to grab it before it's scrubbed to protect the politicians who funded/trained/empowered ISIS.
    In my past readings I came to realize these are both strengths and make ISIS unique. I'll review this in detail over the weekend when I have time.
    Other terrorist groups directly attack a superior enemy in a fight they can never win in the long term. They score short term success and shock (9/11) but ultimately fail because they are outmatched and without a significant base of support (Saudis can only write so many checks before it gets too obvious). ISIS is focusing on resources and recruitment while taking on fights they can win. They still hate Israel and the US but are primarily dedicated to establishing the "state" with it's own economy and infrastructure.
    This never was a JV team.
    As long as the US views the ME as an important and irreplaceable source of energy resources (current US resource/production capabilities notwithstanding), I don't think there's any limit to the check-writing SA or even Iran (in this administration) can get away with.
    One could have thought the same thing with the Taliban at the start of OEF, then looked on in bewilderment as the US gov increasingly began to acquiesce/coordinate/oblige the Taliban government in attempts to get peaceful conditions in Afghanistan. If one or some of the ME states decide to recognize ISIS as a group of hooligans that started with a bloody past, but have matured and now offer "stability", then I wouldn't be shocked if the US became complacent and was not willing to do what it took to stop that from happening.
    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Well, Putin did say yesterday that he could put nuclear warheads on cruise missiles against ISIS, but hoped that it would never be necessary.
    Putin's troll-level is legendary. The worrying part is not being quite so sure that he's bluffing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •