Random guy from Armslist wants to do a deal without an FFL...

[milwaukeeshaker]

Not trying to start any hassles, but do you really think that law enforcement has the time for these type of piddly setups?

So I have listed a couple firearms I am selling in various places, and I get a hit from a guy in Denver that wants to meet up for a sale.

He gets all weird on me when I say we can meet somewhere if you want to examine the firearm, but any sale or transfer will have to be done through an FFL. I hate that shit. I don't know you, I am not breaking any state laws for you, no matter how dumb I think they are in reality. I don't need the hassle or the headache, and I would suspect they wouldn't want it either.

I am just random guy on the internet, who says I'm not law enforcement trying to bust you on this shit. Nope, not playing.

[spqrzilla]

Not trying to start any hassles, but do you really think that law enforcement has the time for these type of piddly setups?

Law enforcement don't have time. Until the day someone wants to see some of that sweet sweet Bloomberg money and finds the time, and you just happened to be the target.
Then they have time.

You can't predict when some DA decides to make his bones with the gun control folk. That's why the whole "No LEO cares" line is horse manure.

[CS1983]

Law enforcement don't have time. Until the day someone wants to see some of that sweet sweet Bloomberg money and finds the time, and you just happened to be the target.
Then they have time.

You can't predict when some DA decides to make his bones with the gun control folk. That's why the whole "No LEO cares" line is horse manure.

They certainly had the time to devote 2 month Undercover work to 5 grams of weed and 2 morphine pills. lol

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/police...142700957.html

[Big E3]

Not trying to start any hassles, but do you really think that law enforcement has the time for these type of piddly setups?

It’s my experience that some ignoring of the law occurs at virtually every FFL in regards to the BGC law. This is my pet peeve when everybody talks about always following the letter of the BGC law. Then I bring up the following section of the state statute about only being able to charge a maximum fee of $10 to do a transfer. I usually get the proverbial they took that out of the law. So just now before posting this post I went to the state web site to copy the section below. I keep a printed copy of the law with me. I have even been told to get out of there shop. It reminds me of confronting a liberal with the facts of an issue and they have no rebuttal so they either shout you down or walk away. I only bring it up to make a point and I don’t believe $10 would cover their expenses.

SECTION 1. Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-112 as
follows:
18-12-112. Private firearms transfers - background check
required - penalty - definitions.
2 (d) A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES
RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN
DOLLARS.

[CS1983]

It’s my experience that some ignoring of the law occurs at virtually every FFL in regards to the BGC law. This is my pet peeve when everybody talks about always following the letter of the BGC law. Then I bring up the following section of the state statute about only being able to charge a maximum fee of $10 to do a transfer. I usually get the proverbial they took that out of the law. So just now before posting this post I went to the state web site to copy the section below. I keep a printed copy of the law with me. I have even been told to get out of there shop. It reminds me of confronting a liberal with the facts of an issue and they have no rebuttal so they either shout you down or walk away. I only bring it up to make a point and I don’t believe $10 would cover their expenses.

SECTION 1. Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-112 as
follows:
18-12-112. Private firearms transfers - background check
required - penalty - definitions.
2 (d) A LICENSED GUN DEALER MAY CHARGE A FEE FOR SERVICES
RENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHICH FEE SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN
DOLLARS.

In my experience they charge their pre-"law" transfer fee+the "state" $10.

This goes back to my idea on itemizing every single damnable tax aspect of a sale for anything, everywhere so folks' $5 burger is shown to actually be $3 or whatever it would be if the .gov didn't tax like crazy. People have no idea how much they pay in taxes in total, from "income"(which should not be one's basic wage) to everything else.

I'm reading a trilogy by Walter Macken about Ireland, which traces from the time of the Cromwellian invasion of Ireland to after the 1916 rebellion. Frankly, I see no substantial difference in how the Irish were treated by the English and how we are treated as "citizens". And moreover, I see no real difference in treatment our National ancestors received from the King of England which sparked this whole failed experiment to begin with. We threw off one tyrant for many.