Close
Results 1 to 10 of 161

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MOLON LABE View Post
    Is there a precedent for a federal law being no longer applied to an item and then States using existing laws, or creating laws to ban the private, otherwise legal ownership of said items?

    If current legal NFA ownership is currently overiding Colorado view of suppressors as dangerous weapons, then wouldn't the Feds view of suppressors as nothing more than the purchase of a handgun, or long gun wouldn't that also preempt Colorado law?

    Velocitas, Opprimere,
    Violentia Operandi
    You mean kind of like how federal law doesn't restrict owning a magazine with a capacity greater than 15 rounds but Colorado does?

  2. #2
    Joe_K
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ray1970 View Post
    You mean kind of like how federal law doesn't restrict owning a magazine with a capacity greater than 15 rounds but Colorado does?
    Aside from the AWB there was never a federal ban on magazine capacity.

    Err "restriction on magazine capacity"

    But I get your point, makes sense.

    Velocitas, Opprimere,
    Violentia Operandi

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •