Judicious use of resources, I must admit..
I didn't think of real estate uses- I don't think the registry existed last time I bought a home... and because of the remoteness of where I live (and the proximity to numerous prisons), I'm suspicious of anyone I can't identify.. (and some I can identify)

and just something to keep in mind, (this is from: http://dcj.state.co.us/odvsom/sex_of...gistration.pdf )

"The sex offender registry includes only those persons who have been required by law to register and who are in compliance with the sex offender registrations laws. Persons should not rely solely on the sex offender registry as a safeguard against perpetrators of sexual assault in their communities. Since most sexual assault crimes are not reported, most sex offenders are not convicted of their crimes and therefore will not be listed on the sex offender registry. The crime for which a person is convicted may not accurately reflect the level of risk."

so the Sex Offender Management Board states the registry has a limited value...

I know, it's a disclaimer meant to absolve them of responsibility.. er, I mean, protect them from lawsuits..

I wanted to bring it up, as a point that one should avoid "tunnel vision" and overlook a real threat, because they were so focused on a registry... same point I was trying to make with the other dangerous criminals that lack a registry for the crimes they committed.