Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    265

    Default CBI Information on "designed to be readily convertible"

    Thought this was interesting and it seems to say that, for example, Charlie Coopers magazines are good to go in CO without the floor plate epoxied so you can still maintain them (since that is what the floor plate is designed for) as long as you don't swap out the magblock for the original follower. New to the state so maybe you all have seen this, but I was happy to see this since I have the Charlie Coopers 15/30 PMAGs without the floor plate glued, which many consider a no go in my home state of CT which has a very differently worded ban. Text from CBI technical guidance:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2017-09-28 at 12.59.31 PM.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	280.3 KB 
ID:	72129

    Obviously the floor plate is designed for maintenance and the magazine block that entirely replaces the 30 round follower is designed to limit it to 15 rounds only. Thus, it doesn't seem to meet Colorado's designed to be readily converted text since no part of the magazine is designed to be readily converted.

    As always, I am not a lawyer.
    Last edited by Will1776; 09-29-2017 at 08:35.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,958

    Default

    What mag ban?

    Almost every gun shop has 15 plus round magazines for sale in this state.

  3. #3
    Thinks Gravy Boats are SEXY ASF! izzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    1,630

    Default

    Why oh why?


  4. #4
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    What mag ban?

    Almost every gun shop has 15 plus round magazines for sale in this state.
    lol true

  5. #5
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,788

    Default

    My advice: don't worry about it. If your mags aren't date coded after 7/1/13, it's an utterly irrelevant distinction. IF you found yourself on the wrong end of a prosecution for illegal mags, the burden of proof is on the state to prove you acquired them after that date, which should be impossible. Besides, (as has already been beaten to death here, hence the facepalm) realistically, the only way you will end up charged with this is if you have other charges pending, and they're trying to stack shit on to get leverage for a plea bargain.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  6. #6
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    265

    Default

    It would be pretty easy to prove I didn't have them before 2014 since 10+ mags were banned in CT and they could ask CT if I registered any, which neither I or my dad did. (yeah CT made people register their magazines....)

    Only possibility would be some mags my grandpa in Nevada may have given me before the 2014 date that have been stored in his home in Nevada.
    Only question is the continuous possession clause.

    Honestly the 15 rounds isn't terrible to deal with other than for competitions so I'll probably just deal with it until it gets repealed or ruled unconstitutional. If that happens, I can use the normal followers included with my 15 rounders and swap out the parts. Until then, might as well stay safe with the Charlie Coopers 15 rounder in my rifle and the CBI technical guidance in my pocket (on my phone).

  7. #7
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
    One of the biggest mistakes people make is to lie. E.g. when under questioning "where did you obtain these magazines" and they say *uh... lie* "Brownells back in 2012"

    Correct answer to any LEO question during an interview/interrogation: Lawyer. Lawyer.

    LEO suspicion doesn't matter at all in the scope of the legal system. (Not addressing the quoted post, just adding to it)
    Oh yeah that's a really good point. Is having a 15+ magazine in your possession and then not answering questions without a lawyer probable cause for them to arrest you though?

  8. #8
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default


  9. #9
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,960

    Default

    FFS

    DADT
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  10. #10
    Self Conscious About His "LOAD" 00tec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Aggieland, TX
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    FFS

    DADT
    Agreed.

    Didnt do shit
    Didn't see shit
    Don't know shit
    Ain't gonna say shit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •