Ok, so for you guys who think the nra is selling us out, lay out a strategy that will actually allow a win where bump stocks, etc aren't redefined as NFA.
Ok, so for you guys who think the nra is selling us out, lay out a strategy that will actually allow a win where bump stocks, etc aren't redefined as NFA.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
In this particular scenario, that's easy. My approach would be: Bump stocks are legal. They were approved under the Obama administration. Nothing has changed concerning bump stocks with the exception a madman used one in a murderous spree while already violating numerous laws. We are willing to discuss additional regulations on bump stocks once the Hearing Protection Act is passed (or pick a project).
As it is they are giving away the store while asking for nothing. I don't mind some compromise on occasion and I think this is a perfect time to get what we want while potentially giving up something that won't affect a lot of people.
If you want $18,000 for your car, ask for $20,000 knowing the offer will be $15,000. Compromise on the $18,000 you wanted.
NRA leadership must be learning their "strategy" from republican leadership in the house and senate. Which is basically asking the democrats exactly where they want their asses kissed.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Last edited by Justin; 10-08-2017 at 15:42.
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.