Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
I love after every tragedy there's "this guy" who's making a point by destroying an AR. Then his next comment is, "This will do nothing." And he's absolutely right unless he was planning on committing a violent act with the rifle that's now destroyed, which I'm willing to bet he probably wasn't.
Someone make a Meme of a just purchased AR and say, "One More."Originally Posted by DEAGLER
Ahh, the ol' Hilary defense...
No, that's just how laws generally work. A lot include intent, or knowingly doing something
If laws weren't gray there would be no need for the court process.
No that's how the laws work for the elites. For the rest of us its "Ignorance of the law is no excuse".
I doubt he'll be charged as well, but that's because the ATF approves of what he's done. But the truth is, whether he realized it or not or whether he intended it or not, he committed a felony and if the ATF (or local PD for that matter) wanted to prosecute, they could and they'd likely win (unless a jury full of New Yorkers were to Nulify ... which isn't out of the question).
Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".
"Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
"Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
-Penn Jillette
A World Without Guns <- Great Read!
That was my first thought too.
I'm still planning on using this if I ever get pulled over for speeding. Just like Hillary officer, I did not intend to break the law. I have never had a speeding ticket but I have to believe that some officers out there in rural areas may be impressed with my attempt
Man, if I only knew of a person or a group of people that regularly enforced laws...I could ask them.
But since I clearly don't I'm willing to bet that any group of jurors you found would agree that the "rifle" was being destroyed and/or in the process of being destroyed.
And I'm willing to bet that 99.9 percent of LE would say, "Looks like a destroyed rifle to me."
As long as it helps promote the agenda, they won't be held accountable.
Remember this one? NBC's David Gregory Won't Be Charged For Showing Ammo Magazine
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
It's fun to point out creating an SBR first, but I can't imagine anyone actually being upset about him committing a felony in the process.
"There are no finger prints under water."
The hilarious thing here is that all these liberals are cheering him on yet he is technically performing a felony while saying he is a legal gun owner. These people are the ones calling for something to be done and more laws, yet they CLEARLY don't know what laws are on the books already. This just proves the point that we have far too many asinine gun laws on the books as it is, if this guy in his attempt to destroy a gun actually made it more dangerous in the eyes of our government.
It seems like improving the Fed BGC system is gaining momentum and I have to say I might be for it depending on what they do, but one of my conditions would be to ban states from performing additional BGCs. One single good list, not that plus 50 more lists. And while they are at it, tie that bill to national reciprocity like a driver's license.
Last edited by KAPA; 02-19-2018 at 13:58.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote