The step I'm still waiting for is for a major manufacturer to refuse to sell firearms to LEOs in a restrictive state.
If enough get on board, THAT would be a game changer.
O2
The step I'm still waiting for is for a major manufacturer to refuse to sell firearms to LEOs in a restrictive state.
If enough get on board, THAT would be a game changer.
O2
YOU are the first responder. Police, fire and medical are SECOND responders.
When seconds count, the police are mere minutes away...
Gun registration is gun confiscation in slow motion.
My feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/53226-O2HeN2
I thought Barrett already did that in California.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
Kinda of. They gave money to the Illinois FireArms Manufacturers Association which caved in a bad bill that exempted manufacturers from huge new licensing fees that would kill dealers. Once they (Springfield) were made aware of it they pulled out and fought the impending legislation. The IFMA are scumbags that took Springfield's money and donated it to anti-gun Democrat's election funds.
Illinois politics.
It's not going to stop me from buying an EMP 4" Concealed Contour.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
My Feedback
So I was reading the Dick's annual report to find what percentage firearms is their business. While I didn't find that answer, here is an interesting tidbit.
Harm to our reputation could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers and employees.
Negative publicity or perceptions involving the Company or our brands, products, vendors, spokespersons, or marketing and other partners may negatively impact our reputation and adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers and employees. Failure to detect, prevent, or mitigate issues that might give rise to reputational risk or failure to adequately address negative publicity or perceptions could adversely impact our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition. Issues that might pose a reputational risk include an inability to achieve our omni-channel goals, including providing an eCommerce and delivery experience that meets the expectations of consumers; failure of our cyber-security measures to protect against data breaches; product liability and product recalls; our social media activity; failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations; our policies related to the sale of firearms and accessories; public stances on controversial social or political issues; and any of the other risks enumerated in these risk factors. Furthermore, the prevalence of social media may accelerate and increase the potential scope of any negative publicity we might receive and could increase the negative impact of these issues on our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The chair is against the wall has a long mustache.