Close
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 53
  1. #21
    Nerdy Mod
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,407

    Default

    The step I'm still waiting for is for a major manufacturer to refuse to sell firearms to LEOs in a restrictive state.

    If enough get on board, THAT would be a game changer.

    O2
    YOU are the first responder. Police, fire and medical are SECOND responders.
    When seconds count, the police are mere minutes away...
    Gun registration is gun confiscation in slow motion.

    My feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/53226-O2HeN2

  2. #22
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I thought Barrett already did that in California.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  3. #23
    Viewer Discretion is Advised! UrbanWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Not Detriot yet, Ohio
    Posts
    1,696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by O2HeN2 View Post
    The step I'm still waiting for is for a major manufacturer to refuse to sell firearms to LEOs in a restrictive state.

    If enough get on board, THAT would be a game changer.

    O2
    Federal government will buy them and give it to the states.
    Disclaimer: I can't spell.

  4. #24
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I thought Barrett already did that in California.
    I was just about to say that. I think they won't service or offer tech support to California LEO

  5. #25
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I thought Barrett already did that in California.
    Yep, cut off sales & support for the .50 BMG rifles made illegal for anyone but law enforcement in CA. Was an awesome move from Ronnie Barrett.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  6. #26
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by izzy View Post
    Well played
    I'm just old. I was using "#Sand" before hashtagging was a thing.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  7. #27
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
    Wasn't SA on the shit list a few months ago for being in bed with the gun grabbers?
    Kinda of. They gave money to the Illinois FireArms Manufacturers Association which caved in a bad bill that exempted manufacturers from huge new licensing fees that would kill dealers. Once they (Springfield) were made aware of it they pulled out and fought the impending legislation. The IFMA are scumbags that took Springfield's money and donated it to anti-gun Democrat's election funds.

    Illinois politics.

    It's not going to stop me from buying an EMP 4" Concealed Contour.

  8. #28
    OtterbatHellcat
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Central Arizona
    Posts
    21,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
    Dicks is just trying to gain all the free advertising they can to become REI and sell overpriced hipster crap and tactical hiking sticks. I doubt firearm sales have even been a fraction of a percent of profit, and who actually goes to them for ammo or anything else. Dicks has gone home to roost and decided their most profitable customer base are actual, entitled, liberal dicks.

    And they might not be wrong.

    If they lose a small percentage of business but gain the loyal business of SJW, it may be profitable. Of course, they forget that many are SJW in part because they are unemployable/underemployed and want free shit.

    If you ever run for anything, I'd walk neighborhoods with the clipboard for you.


    ΜΟΛ
    ΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    My Feedback

  9. #29
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tor Larson View Post
    Hornady just told New York to go micturate on themselves. Good for them. New York sucks be it their sports teams, their government, or their laws.

    https://www.tactical-life.com/news/h...agencies-ammo/
    Hopefully other manufacturers will do the same.

  10. #30
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    DTC, CO
    Posts
    823

    Default

    So I was reading the Dick's annual report to find what percentage firearms is their business. While I didn't find that answer, here is an interesting tidbit.

    Harm to our reputation could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers and employees.

    Negative publicity or perceptions involving the Company or our brands, products, vendors, spokespersons, or marketing and other partners may negatively impact our reputation and adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers and employees. Failure to detect, prevent, or mitigate issues that might give rise to reputational risk or failure to adequately address negative publicity or perceptions could adversely impact our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition. Issues that might pose a reputational risk include an inability to achieve our omni-channel goals, including providing an eCommerce and delivery experience that meets the expectations of consumers; failure of our cyber-security measures to protect against data breaches; product liability and product recalls; our social media activity; failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations; our policies related to the sale of firearms and accessories; public stances on controversial social or political issues; and any of the other risks enumerated in these risk factors. Furthermore, the prevalence of social media may accelerate and increase the potential scope of any negative publicity we might receive and could increase the negative impact of these issues on our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.
    The chair is against the wall has a long mustache.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •