Close
Results 1 to 10 of 46

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,787

    Default

    To create such a force may well violate a treaty to which we subscribe...

    https://www.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm...VY7Jc.facebook
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  2. #2
    Varmiteer Honey Badger282.8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Salina, KS
    Posts
    520

    Default

    Space is a maritime environment and the Navy is the branch with the most expertise in that area. Hell, a lot of the space assets the Air Force operates were developed from technologies and missions pioneered by the Navy; GPS being the most famous example. Leave the Earth-focused space missions to the Air Force and give all manned military missions to the Navy.


    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    To create such a force may well violate a treaty to which we subscribe...

    https://www.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm...VY7Jc.facebook
    Just because we can't put weapons of mass destruction in space or create military bases on any celestial bodies doesn't mean there is no military purpose to space. There is no ban of military space stations so long as they do not contain WMDs, there is no ban of military vessels in space. The U.S. Navy has shot down a satellite that had a high probability of surviving reentry with lots of hydrazine onboard. China developed an ASAT (anti-satellite) missile and destroyed one of it's weather satellites while it was still in it's orbital station. The resulting debris fouled an entire orbital plane leading to many secondary impacts and damage to other assets. Space is already militarized.

  3. #3
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honey Badger282.8 View Post
    Just because we can't put weapons of mass destruction in space or create military bases on any celestial bodies doesn't mean there is no military purpose to space. There is no ban of military space stations so long as they do not contain WMDs, there is no ban of military vessels in space. The U.S. Navy has shot down a satellite that had a high probability of surviving reentry with lots of hydrazine onboard. China developed an ASAT (anti-satellite) missile and destroyed one of it's weather satellites while it was still in it's orbital station. The resulting debris fouled an entire orbital plane leading to many secondary impacts and damage to other assets. Space is already militarized.
    This. While this conversation may be hitting the main stream populous as a conversation topic now, everyone is pretty much way too late to the conversation.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •