Close
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,775

    Default

    The campus has a no weapon policy. Definition of a weapon "a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage".

    Doesn't throwing a hockey puck at someone make it become a weapon? So following that logic it should fall under the no weapon policy...
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  2. #2
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    Doesn't throwing a hockey puck at someone make it become a weapon? So following that logic it should fall under the no weapon policy...
    Just like an AR pistol brace, it is not how it is used, it is how it is designed and intended to be used........
    Last edited by SideShow Bob; 11-28-2018 at 16:48.
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  3. #3
    Finally Called Dillon Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,877

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    The campus has a no weapon policy. Definition of a weapon "a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage".

    Doesn't throwing a hockey puck at someone make it become a weapon? So following that logic it should fall under the no weapon policy...
    If sporting goods are allowed on campus, and can therefore be used in self defense against an active shooter, then they should have no problem with students having competition target pistols with them, and, hey, maybe, in an active shooting situation, those target pistols could be used to distract an active shooter by putting a hole in his chest.
    RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM

    If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.

    For legal reasons, that's a joke.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •