It depends on many variables and factors but in our instance we stopped about every 2 hours and the total stop was usually about 20min or so before we were able to get back on the road. That was about how long we'd be driving before we were looking to exit to use the restroom and grab a water anyway. You exit, plug in, walk to the nearest convenience store to stretch your legs & use the bathroom, grab some water & some snacks and by the time you got back to the car you had less than 10 minutes to wait in most cases. There really was no point during our 2,500 miles over 5 days that we were wishing we could just keep driving instead of stopping. At no point did we find ourselves saying "another stop? I was just getting into the groove here and wanted to keep going" so I don't put a lot of weight in people claiming that having to stop to charge would alter their lives significantly especially when we're talking about something most people do once a year on average.
Those numbers are close to a worse case scenario within the Tesla lineup as well. It was in a 60kWh car and most these days are north of 75kWh with several in the 100kWh range being made today. The difference is a car that gets around 200 miles of range versus car that gets around 300 miles of range. The new Long Range Model 3 gets closer to 350 miles or range or damn near double the range of the car we have. In the not-so-distant future we'll see cars north of that. Our car with a max range of 200 miles exceeds our normal daily commute by 10x though so I think people put too much weight in long road trips but that too has been addressed by Tesla and continues getting better.
Another key is that recent announcements have stated that Tesla will be not only doubling the Supercharger stations again in 2019 but will also be "significantly increasing the charge speed" all at the same time. Some are predicting that charge speeds could nearly double which will halve the amount of time you sit charging. So instead of 20-25min on average more like 10-12min. That's for cars already made and already on the road today not future technology which could see improvements on both charging and battery side to cut that down even more.
The higher the capacity of the battery the longer the range which is obvious to most. What isn't as obvious is that the higher the capacity the faster they take a charge. This means that those larger capacity batteries not only require less stops but sit for less time when they do stop. Hence my statement that our car is basically a worst case scenario and it was still perfectly enjoyable.
They're also making some advancements that some are speculating will arrive in vehicles in the next few years or so that will both increase range as well as decrease battery and cost to produce. The forthcoming Roadster (supposed to come out in about two years) is estimated to have a range of over 600 miles. That's absurd and coming awfully close to some people's pie-in-the-sky idea of what range an EV should have. This doesn't even factor in what technology upgrades are on the horizon which will make charge times faster, longer range, lower cost and longer life. The deal they just inked buying the battery tech company last week is reported to have pioneered a tech that will add over 20% range to existing batteries and make them longer lasting, lighter weight and lower cost. Some speculate that this tech could see it's way into a refreshed version of the Model S/X or Roadster which would mean that we see that in the next couple of years.






Reply With Quote
