Close
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Glock Armorer for sexual favors Jer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    Posts
    6,257
    I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
    Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
    For my feedback Click Here.
    Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read

  2. #2
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    I really can't wait for the shit show to start for the judge who approved the ERPO.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  3. #3
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,849

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    I really can't wait for the shit show to start for the judge who approved the ERPO.
    I actually support it just for sake of showing how stupid it is. The standards require (much as a TPRO) that everything in the ex-parte complaint be assumed true - without any notice or response from an opposing party - even if it sounds ridiculous and the judge himself doesn't personally believe it. There are also no real ramifications for doing it - save in this accord, since it's an LEO, the DA will probably pursue a perjury charge; but for Jo-Blow, anyone can lie and claim they are (whatever necessary to file) and even when you disprove that, they won't face consequences - if she did it anonymously I don't see how she would've even in these circumstances; but she didn't. Everyone file an anonymous ex-parte complaint on your local magistrate and judge in the adjoining county, and it'll get cleaned up quickly.

  4. #4
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OxArt View Post
    The standards require (much as a TPRO) that everything in the ex-parte complaint be assumed true - without any notice or response from an opposing party - even if it sounds ridiculous and the judge himself doesn't personally believe it.
    How can any judge deny any ERPO position under these standards?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  5. #5
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Pretty interesting abuse. From the little info in the article, it would appear that this lady is upset and wants to enact some sort of revenge on the officer, but does not otherwise care how her actions will effect the legitimacy of this law. There really can't be a more perfect case to illustrate the problems with this law.

  6. #6
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Pretty interesting abuse. From the little info in the article, it would appear that this lady is upset and wants to enact some sort of revenge on the officer, but does not otherwise care how her actions will effect the legitimacy of this law. There really can't be a more perfect case to illustrate the problems with this law.
    Unfortunately, this is just the tip of the iceberg, having allowed an erpo to be filed. Think of how many other people with an ax to grind with law enforcement will do the same.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •