If we shove a carrot in a horse and a unicorn popped out, we'd be able to fly to work too.
Basically, it's a lower court decision, there's 0.0% chance of an appeals court endorsing it - law doesn't work consistently, judges write precedence simply to conform to their desired outcome, 100% of the time - and with an appeals court, the panel's BEST CASE desired outcome is to keep lowers on 4473's. Worst case is the panel wants to make all split frames, e.g. lowers and uppers illegal... and tries to use the opportunity.






Reply With Quote
