Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,682

    Default

    It seems like the US military is starting to turn into Japan or Italy in WWII with an excessive number of service cartridges.

    The pendulum swings back and forth, with a few low points along the way...

    1890- .45-70-500 rifle, .45-55-405 carbine, .45 revolver (Schofield length case).

    1918- .30-06 M1906, .45 ACP

    1950- .30-06 M2, .30 M1 Carbine, .45 ACP, .38 Special

    2000- 7.62x51mm, 5.56 M855, 5.56 M193, 9mm NATO (and some .45 ACP in SOCOM or .300 Win Mag for snipers)

    How many are in use now?

  2. #22
    Really is Llama Not_A_Llama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Denver
    Posts
    992

    Default

    Don’t get lost in the sales hyperbole. This is special application stuff for special groups.
    9mm - because they don't make a 9.1mm

  3. #23
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_A_Llama View Post
    Don’t get lost in the sales hyperbole. This is special application stuff for special groups.
    Yeah, but even the logistics for special groups starts to become a problem when enough variations are introduced without little to no interchangeability.

  4. #24
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Haven't had to fight a full-scale war for a while. Military minds begin to wander to find ways to expand their budgets.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  5. #25
    Girth can be an issue Madusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Durango
    Posts
    344

    Default 6mm not enough

    Don?t you think a sniper cartridge should have max lethal range? I guess what I?m saying is that you want a cartridge that will be lethal from the muzzle as far as it is supersonic. I know some of you believe transonic can be breached without disruption, that may be true at the cost of billistic coefficient. The other issue is energy. When the M9 won the military contract in the 80?s the minimum energy they would approve was 400lbs. So I believe if the government wants a new sniper round it needs to have 400 lbs just before it goes transonic. That sticks you with 120g + bullets. The Russians may have figured this out in WW2.
    Last edited by Madusa; 06-09-2020 at 20:18. Reason: Title
    It's better to die upon your feet than to live upon your knees!

  6. #26
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    137

    Default

    It's kind of like the .300 Blackout. All the hype and talk during the release but it's been available for years in a different form. I'll probably buy one.

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Linkless View Post
    It's kind of like the .300 Blackout. All the hype and talk during the release but it's been available for years in a different form. I'll probably buy one.
    I suspect this is exactly like 300 Blk. the military was playing around and found a cartridge that they wanted to put into commission, but it's not legitimized. Cant cut a contract on a cartridge that isn't being pumped out by a manufacturer. So, SOCOM finds someone who will legitimize it to make it accessible. 6AR is probably still under patent and Hornady didn't want to buy it. So, the redesign the shoulders, submit it to SAAMI, boom. New cartridge to fulfill the contract. There are a few in the Govt in the "what's new and do we want it" gun-nut crowds working for the military. SO... they start dicing around with Hornady looking for a 'better' cartridge and they shoot and test an array of different ammo. They shoot 6 AR and figure out it's an amazing cartridge that will work in the AR-15/M-4/M-16 platform and they got excited. I've been enamored with 6 AR/Grendel for a couple years now, but getting a barrel isn't just pulling one off the shelf. This is going to legitimize the 6mm in the AR-15. It might very well kill 6.5 Grendel.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  8. #28
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    So hold off on building a 6.5 Grendel?

  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    So hold off on building a 6.5 Grendel?
    Depends on the use and time frame. Hunting hogs this summer? no, build the Grendel. Shooting PRC matches and making a gas gun for the division but currently shooting a bolt gun? Sure, hold off.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  10. #30
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Copy, thanks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •