3 New CO Guns Signed into Law

[kidicarus13]

What is harrasment in CO law?

(1) A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she:

(a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact;  or

(b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person;  or

(c) Follows a person in or about a public place;  or

(d) Repealed by?Laws 1990, H.B.90-1118, ? 11?.

(e) Directly or indirectly initiates communication with a person or directs language toward another person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, telephone network, data network, text message, instant message, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium in a manner intended to harass or threaten bodily injury or property damage, or makes any comment, request, suggestion, or proposal by telephone, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium that is obscene;  or

(f) Makes a telephone call or causes a telephone to ring repeatedly, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate conversation;  or

(g) Makes repeated communications at inconvenient hours that invade the privacy of another and interfere in the use and enjoyment of another's home or private residence or other private property;  or

(h) Repeatedly insults, taunts, challenges, or makes communications in offensively coarse language to, another in a manner likely to provoke a violent or disorderly response.

(1.5) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, ?obscene? means a patently offensive description of ultimate sexual acts or solicitation to commit ultimate sexual acts, whether or not said ultimate sexual acts are normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, or excretory functions.

(2) Harassment pursuant to subsection (1) of this section is a class 3 misdemeanor;  except that harassment is a class 1 misdemeanor if the offender commits harassment pursuant to subsection (1) of this section with the intent to intimidate or harass another person because of that person's actual or perceived race;  color;  religion;  ancestry;  national origin;  physical or mental disability, as defined in?section 18-9-121(5)(a)?;  or sexual orientation, as defined in?section 18-9-121(5)(b)?.

(3) Any act prohibited by paragraph (e) of subsection (1) of this section may be deemed to have occurred or to have been committed at the place at which the telephone call, electronic mail, or other electronic communication was either made or received.

[Eric P]

So intentionally driving the speed limit on a 2 lane road and smiling at the a hole behind you tailgating could be considered harassment and I loose my guns. This amuses me at the total vague stupidity in laws.

[def90]

So intentionally driving the speed limit on a 2 lane road and smiling at the a hole behind you tailgating could be considered harassment and I loose my guns. This amuses me at the total vague stupidity in laws.

Well, on top of the 2 Lane Highway left lane driving law we have here that you would also be violating.

[Eric P]

2 lane highway is 1 direction each way not 2 lanes in one direction. That would be a multilane highway.

[Seamonkey]

https://www.reporterherald.com/2021/...lder-shooting/

cruelty to animals...

P.A.U.S.E. act anyone?

[crays]

(1) A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she:

(a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact;  or

(b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person;  or

(c) Follows a person in or about a public place;  or

(d) Repealed by?Laws 1990, H.B.90-1118, ? 11?.

(e) Directly or indirectly initiates communication with a person or directs language toward another person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, telephone network, data network, text message, instant message, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium in a manner intended to harass or threaten bodily injury or property damage, or makes any comment, request, suggestion, or proposal by telephone, computer, computer network, computer system, or other interactive electronic medium that is obscene;  or

(f) Makes a telephone call or causes a telephone to ring repeatedly, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate conversation;  or

(g) Makes repeated communications at inconvenient hours that invade the privacy of another and interfere in the use and enjoyment of another's home or private residence or other private property;  or

(h) Repeatedly insults, taunts, challenges, or makes communications in offensively coarse language to, another in a manner likely to provoke a violent or disorderly response.

(1.5) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, ?obscene? means a patently offensive description of ultimate sexual acts or solicitation to commit ultimate sexual acts, whether or not said ultimate sexual acts are normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, or excretory functions.

(2) Harassment pursuant to subsection (1) of this section is a class 3 misdemeanor;  except that harassment is a class 1 misdemeanor if the offender commits harassment pursuant to subsection (1) of this section with the intent to intimidate or harass another person because of that person's actual or perceived race;  color;  religion;  ancestry;  national origin;  physical or mental disability, as defined in?section 18-9-121(5)(a)?;  or sexual orientation, as defined in?section 18-9-121(5)(b)?.

(3) Any act prohibited by paragraph (e) of subsection (1) of this section may be deemed to have occurred or to have been committed at the place at which the telephone call, electronic mail, or other electronic communication was either made or received.

It’s scary how soft our society has become.

[wctriumph]

In all fairness, life will never be fair ...
No matter how many laws are created to manage the human condition ...

[bellavite1]

So, at this point, is it challenge-able and is anyone in the process of challenging it?

[def90]

So, at this point, is it challenge-able and is anyone in the process of challenging it?

Well, there was the original suit by Jon Caldera that was challenging the constitutionality of the Boulder ordinance and kept getting declined because higher courts kept saying it was a state issue.. well now it’s a constitutional issue again.

[.455_Hunter]

Any law that goes into place that seemingly restricts rights as viewed by progressives gets an immediate injunction before the ink is dry.

Any law that goes into place that seemingly restricts rights as viewed by conservatives/libertarians much be in full effect for years (if ever) to even get a sniff of consideration for legal relief.