Yeah, committing 26 serious crimes including multiple homicides is worth a life sentence. There are no do overs. This wasn't a little screw up or victimless crime. It doesn't matter if he was scared or incompetent, he committed 26 serious crimes against real people and property. Requiring that he serve time for each of his crimes is not a malicious law.
Are you suggesting that people should be allowed to cause as much trouble as possible, hurt as many people as possible, kill as many people as possible and as long as their crimes are part of the same trial, they only do time for one of those crimes? Because that's what you're saying when you say the sentencing laws are malicious.
What's malicious is letting this guy off easy.






Reply With Quote
