Colorado HB 22-1279

[hollohas]

The left pushes "coexist". While we all know that only applies to people they agree with, I'm fine with that. I have ZERO interest in coexisting with people who are cool with killing babies, left or right. People who think that are monsters and I will never coexist willingly with them. There is no middle ground on this and I will never accept it as simply part of our culture now.

We can't just chalk it up as a loss and move on. I hope people don't forget this when they vote, but I'm sure they will.

[earplug]

Having lived in a neighborhood with alcohol syndrome and crackhead damaged children I don't think most of the posters are willing to adopt or pay for the life time maintenance there advocating.
Its fine to rally around some religious belief when its not your time or money.
Later the same prolife advocates complain when there supporting a homeless mental wreck who is creating more issues.

[gta_spec]

All human life has the same value. This is their way of stating that value is zero.

[buffalobo]

Having lived in a neighborhood with alcohol syndrome and crackhead damaged children I don't think most of the posters are willing to adopt or pay for the life time maintenance there advocating. - why not kill mother instead, would stop her from making anymore defective children.

Its fine to rally around some religious belief when its not your time or money. - when the .gov gives grants to planned parenthood then it is my money.

Later the same prolife advocates complain when there supporting a homeless mental wreck who is creating more issues.

[Sawin]

Their point of view has to be something akin to “the world needs less humans (or the Earth is doomed) how can we make an impact?”

the answers I’ve seen lately look like:
Viruses
Wars
Abortions

you’d think they’d be pro gun, except that would mean they can’t be as “efficient” with their genocides.

[Great-Kazoo]

Their point of view has to be something akin to “the world needs less humans (or the Earth is doomed) how can we make an impact?”

the answers I’ve seen lately look like:
Viruses
Wars
Abortions

you’d think they’d be pro gun, except that would mean they can’t be as “efficient” with their genocides.

Perhaps it's time to identify as a Ukraine citizen, they have no problem supplying them with weapons.

[hollohas]

Its fine to rally around some religious belief when its not your time or money.
Later the same prolife advocates complain when there supporting a homeless mental wreck who is creating more issues.

Not murdering babies is not a religious belief. It's a human one.

And "religious" people donate a shit ton of time and money to help support people going through those troubles. Religious families also adopt at a much higher rate than most.

[earplug]

1st amendment says freedom from religion. Defining when a human is a human is playing god. Most of the prolife groups don't agree on a time. I really don't care what a religious group does as long as they leave me alone.
As some cultures don't count the 1st year of life due to mortality issues, and some cultures remove infants from the gene pool due to medical or gender issues how is one supposed to agree on what religion is to mandate rules in a nation?
The dominate religion in the USA can't agree on when a person needs baptism and at what age. or What book to read or if someone should intercede between their god or if a infant is born into a state of sin or works there way into that state.
I wish to be left alone and to let others make their own choice based on best outcome.
I prefer fix a issue at the lowest level practical.

[gta_spec]

Most of the prolife groups don't agree on a time.

I've never seen a pro life group that considered anything later than conception.

God says life begins at conception. Today's science doesnt disagree.

I prefer that people take responsibility for their actions. If they did, they might find out what a blessing children are.

[hollohas]

As some cultures don't count the 1st year of life due to mortality issues, and some cultures remove infants from the gene pool due to medical or gender issues how is one supposed to agree on what religion is to mandate rules in a nation?

So, you're totally cool with that?

I'm not.

Babies are live human people, that has NOTHING to do with religion. Killing them is murder.

As someone mentioned before, by your logic, it should be totally legal to murder anyone of any age. Who's to say when people become people, am I right? It's just cultural! 1 month? 1 year? Maybe they're not people until they turn 18, they are just children after all. It should be up to their parents if they live, right?

What an absolutely ridiculous argument.