Instead of throwing your vote away on a candidate that has no chance of winning, doesn't it make more sense to vote for the guy that is in favor of some restrictions, as opposed to the guy that is in favor of no restrictions?
Even if Peotter were to win, he would have no power since the party with the most delegates has control of all the various committees.
If there were to be a vote on more or less restrictions on abortion, how would he vote?
As an idealist, he would abstain or vote present. As a pragmatist, he would likely vote with the Republicans. In a Senate as tightly divided as it is currently, each vote is vital.
The Senate this year is about voting for the team, not the player.



Reply With Quote

