no, we get it. You don't think there is a problem until someone dies.
You keep talking about how he was doing as an adult told him, that this wasn't a threat and he didn't have a gun but all of those facts are HINDSIGHT AFTER THEY CHECKED INTO IT. FFS... You wouldn't be defending him if he shot people or they found a gun cache in his bedroom but because they rightfully checked on the mental status of the kid and found nothing, we should go back in time and do nothing. lol
By the way, no I'm not biased against the mentally ill one bit (although you are apparently a master at reading minds); they can't be held responsible for their actions any more than I can for hitting someone while coming out of anesthesia... what I AM biased against is the phychiatry field being unable to figure out which ones are a danger and which ones are not until someone dies and not having a system for making sure the dangerous ones stay on their meds.





Reply With Quote


