Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Maybe President Obama will find a Marine Lt. Col. and a GS-9 secretary (administrative assistant) to shred all of the documents and pretend the administration didn't know what was going on.

    The bombing in Libya will continue until morale improves. That is all.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  2. #22
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    1,473

    Default

    He has 60 days to blow-up anything he wants in Libya. The BS to justify any operation after 60 days is an effort to circumvent the limit. The limit is there for a reason; to explain the cost to the public's representatives. If this sitting president wishes to continue operations, get the approval and funding to do so.
    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    Thomas Jefferson

    Feedback

  3. #23
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MED View Post
    He has 60 days to blow-up anything he wants in Libya. The BS to justify any operation after 60 days is an effort to circumvent the limit. The limit is there for a reason; to explain the cost to the public's representatives. If this sitting president wishes to continue operations, get the approval and funding to do so otherwise get the **** out if you aren't going to follow the rules!.
    Fixed... I'm sure we can all agree.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  4. #24
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Fixed... I'm sure we can all agree.

    no arguments here.

  5. #25
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Clint45 View Post
    It would be a stretch to say that use of an armed drone to destroy jets on the ground in conjunction with a NATO peacekeeping operation constitutes an "act of war."

    If they were Mexican Drones and US planes on the ground, I have a feeling you would be seeing things differently. I would say the is most certainly an act of war. No-Fly zone means "No-Fly," not "No-Planes."


    Edit- this has been addressed, I skipped ahead.

  6. #26
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Johnstown
    Posts
    331

    Default

    The problem is there are only a few of us that understand that Obami is violating the law, and even less that really care. Many of the Obami supporters just claim, "it is for the best of the country".


    We should take the funding for the not-a-war in Libya out of the welfare budget and see if it gets a reaction from the liberals.

  7. #27
    Machine Gunner Singlestack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lafayette, Colorado
    Posts
    1,393

    Default Libtard meatheads

    What is it with Libtard politicians and difficulty with the English language? Firing hellfires via Predators isn't an act of war??? Huh???

    Made me think of Clinton saying "...it depends on what the definition of 'is' is"....

    Singlestack
    "Guilty of collusion"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •