Close
Page 11 of 19 FirstFirst ... 678910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 187

Thread: 1911's

  1. #101
    PMAG don't stand for Porno Mag boys sneakerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Aurora, CO
    Posts
    2,947

    Default

    The trend seems to be that you get what you pay for. It might be worth it to drop that gun off at BPTactical and let Bert work on it a bit. He's a long way from Delta though!

  2. #102
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Sure are a lot of nice 1911's here! I have one crappy phone pic of my TRP....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails TRP.jpg  

  3. #103
    PMAG don't stand for Porno Mag boys sneakerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Aurora, CO
    Posts
    2,947

    Default

    Those TRPs are crap. Want to get rid of yours?

  4. #104
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sneakerd View Post
    Those TRPs are crap. Want to get rid of yours?

    LOL...heck no!

    I do love this thing though, shoots much better than I can!

  5. #105
    Gong Shooter PSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sneakerd View Post
    The trend seems to be that you get what you pay for. It might be worth it to drop that gun off at BPTactical and let Bert work on it a bit. He's a long way from Delta though!
    I bought it from a gunsmith here by Delta (Ash Mesa Armory) who likes to mess with 1911s. He sold it to me for wholesale to try it out. Whenever I have a problem I take it back to him and he shows me how to fix it. I'm not really hating on the pistol because you cant make them for that price and not have problems. I've also had a RIA 1911 that had little things that needed tweaked on it. What I have problems with is the so called primary 1911s and the problems some of them have. If I have to tinker on them I'd rather pay 300$ instead of 1K+. Some of them sure look nice tho.

    I've got 1000 pounds of wheel weights that I plan to cast bullets with and run through this pistol by summer of next year. We'll see how it holds up.

  6. #106
    PMAG don't stand for Porno Mag boys sneakerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Aurora, CO
    Posts
    2,947

    Default

    Everything you said makes perfect sense to me. Good luck with that hogleg! Shoot the frack out of it. It'll still make you a better shooter, even if the pistol implodes in the end.

  7. #107
    PMAG don't stand for Porno Mag boys sneakerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Aurora, CO
    Posts
    2,947

    Default

    Here's another- well- not really. I think it almost counts though. This is my Sig 220 SAO with ambi-safety and beavertail grip just as on a good 1911. This .45 is just superb in every way- and Commander-sized, if a little thicker around the grips. 8-rnd mags, tritium sights of course. Very limited production and no longer made. Thanks to Crashdown!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails sg.JPG  

  8. #108
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    greeley co
    Posts
    1,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Graves View Post
    Dwight Van Brunt of Kimber Manufacturing went on record in an issue of gun tests (Nov. 2003) and said "Kimber does not and never has used 'castings' for slides and frames"
    "Kimber does not and never has sourced the machining of slides or
    frames. We have always done it ourselves in Yonkers."
    "Our relationship with Smith and Wesson has been limited to
    purchasing raw forgings - little more than a brick of steel. Further,
    S&W is just one of several sources for forgings we have done business
    with in the past."

    ETA: Do you have a source on those claims Atrain?
    That is from S&W and I did not see raw anywere in there, they also used to make parts for Harley Davidson

  9. #109
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    greeley co
    Posts
    1,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Graves View Post
    Dwight Van Brunt of Kimber Manufacturing went on record in an issue of gun tests (Nov. 2003) and said "Kimber does not and never has used 'castings' for slides and frames"
    "Kimber does not and never has sourced the machining of slides or
    frames. We have always done it ourselves in Yonkers."
    "Our relationship with Smith and Wesson has been limited to
    purchasing raw forgings - little more than a brick of steel. Further,
    S&W is just one of several sources for forgings we have done business
    with in the past."

    ETA: Do you have a source on those claims Atrain?
    That info came from S&W I have all kinds of info so when my kimber friends start talking about my 1911's I just show it to them to shut them up. I did not see anything in there about sending out raw parts it said slides and recievers I dont care I know what I know and I see all the kimber guys who dont want to believe they own a S&W (early kimber) but it does not change the facts, I wonder if that is why kimber had external extractors for awhile.

  10. #110
    Diesel Swinger Graves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    3,531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atrain1 View Post
    That info came from S&W I have all kinds of info so when my kimber friends start talking about my 1911's I just show it to them to shut them up. I did not see anything in there about sending out raw parts it said slides and recievers I dont care I know what I know and I see all the kimber guys who dont want to believe they own a S&W (early kimber) but it does not change the facts, I wonder if that is why kimber had external extractors for awhile.
    Clearly.
    -Mike

    "I have to return some video tapes"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •