Close
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DD977GM2 View Post
    Why would they be against it?


    Also, link is fixed
    I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    ARVADA (Comcast IP Confirmed)
    Posts
    2,761

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MB888 View Post
    I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?
    I can agree with you.

    Then they should treat it like drivers license. Making it legal to CCW in any state
    that have permits etc. The feds dont control the DL and who can and cant have one do they? (serious question not being sarcastic)

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DD977GM2 View Post
    I can agree with you.

    Then they should treat it like drivers license. Making it legal to CCW in any state
    that have permits etc. The feds dont control the DL and who can and cant have one do they? (serious question not being sarcastic)
    Good question and point.

    There's one thing on this link that I think covers that, but I'm not sure

    http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...=189&issue=003

    Myth: H.R. 822 would involve the federal bureaucracy in setting standards for carry permits, resulting in "need" requirements, higher fees, waiting periods, national gun owner registration, or worse.

    FACT: H.R. 822 doesn't require -- or even authorize -- any such action by any federal agency. In fact, since it would amend the Gun Control Act, it would fall under a limitation within that law that authorizes "only such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out" the GCA's provisions. No federal rules or regulations would be needed to implement H.R. 822, which simply overrides certain state laws.
    _______________________________________________
    My Feedback
    http://www.ar-15.co/threads/27366-ghettodub




    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    Yeah, Leave it to our congress to be bipartisan when it comes to screwing the constitution.
    "Al Qaeda had better benefits than Wal-Mart. Although at Wal-Mart, you get to wear your vest more than once." -- Stephen Colbert

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MB888 View Post
    I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?
    exactly. this is a Trojan horse. WTF are we thinking its a good thing to give hte feds more power?

  5. #5
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MB888 View Post
    I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?
    Me too.

    This is just another violation of the 2nd amendment in a different way. We shouldn't need any 'crat to declare us eligible for concealed carry, open carry, NFA. All we need are the locals to vet us for felonies.

  6. #6
    Glock Armorer for sexual favors Jer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    Posts
    6,257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roberth View Post
    Me too.

    This is just another violation of the 2nd amendment in a different way. We shouldn't need any 'crat to declare us eligible for concealed carry, open carry, NFA. All we need are the locals to vet us for felonies.
    Yeah, I agree. We shouldn't need it but the sad fact is we do. Just like we shouldn't need to fight for our 2nd amendment rights but if we don't, who will?
    I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
    Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
    For my feedback Click Here.
    Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •