Close
Results 1 to 10 of 160

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    You guys keep saying he was acting suspicious. What was he doing that was suspicious? Open carrying? Or did somebody who thinks guns are scary call the cops and say he was acting suspicious based solely on the fact that he had a gun? As far as I can tell, he didn't do anything wrong.

    Would I open carry just so that I could spout off some legal cases to the first cop that stopped me? No. And if that is the only reason he did it, maybe he is a bit of an ass. But that doesn't mean he did anything wrong, nor does it justify the cop forcing the guy to do anything he doesn't have to do.
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

  2. #2
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    238

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpienads View Post
    You guys keep saying he was acting suspicious. What was he doing that was suspicious? Open carrying? Or did somebody who thinks guns are scary call the cops and say he was acting suspicious based solely on the fact that he had a gun? As far as I can tell, he didn't do anything wrong.
    I never stated that he was acting suspicious not am I accusing him of being a criminal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpienads View Post
    Would I open carry just so that I could spout off some legal cases to the first cop that stopped me? No. And if that is the only reason he did it, maybe he is a bit of an ass. But that doesn't mean he did anything wrong, nor does it justify the cop forcing the guy to do anything he doesn't have to do.
    That is exactly my point. If I thought he was a criminal I would accuse him of being a criminal. He is an ass, I called him an ass because that is what he is.

    And on the cop bit, I think that the cop was not trying to impede on his rights, I think that he was called to a suspicious male with a gun (yes, the citizen who called in/call taker considered his apparent legal actions to be dangerous without there seeming to be a basis of any need for the police) and acted in a manner to protect his own safety while responding to a potentially dangerous call (most calls for a man with a gun do not turn out to be a person trying to make some type of political statement or other self serving behavior). It seems that the cop did not follow statute verbatim, but instead acted in what seemed to me to be a reasonable nature in response to the nature of the call.

    I apologize if my earlier statements had mislead you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •