Romney becomes an Anti Gun rights advocate

[FastMan]

Neither of the two realistic options in November are exactly palatable, regardless of which positions you switch.

I'd prefer not to have another four years of Obama. Romney hasn't indicated he has one single idea other than not being Obama (not altogether bad, but is this really the best the GOP has to offer?!).

If you think that then you really aren't listening.

- Cut taxes on business
- Slash regulations that are overwhelming small business people and stifling growth.
- Measures to repatriate corporate profits stuck over seas
- Get tough on China
- Unleash US energy exploration and development.
- Lower capital gains tax
- kill obama care.

That's just a short list off the top of my head. With that list of goals, you will see a major resurgence in the private sector the moment he's declared the winner. Employment will come roaring back. Billions of dollars being held in coffers by corporations because of their fear and uncertainty of how Obama's current initiative will impact them, and what he has up his sleeve for attacking them next, will start to get invested in growth opportunities. The newly surging economy will produce a spike in tax revenue inflow, which will help lower the runaway deficit.

The contrast this election between the courses these two men want to take is could not be more striking, or crucial.

[Ridge]

If you think that then you really aren't listening.

- Cut taxes on business
- Slash regulations that are overwhelming small business people and stifling growth.
- Measures to repatriate corporate profits stuck over seas
- Get tough on China
- Unleash US energy exploration and development.
- Lower capital gains tax
- kill obama care.

That's just a short list off the top of my head. With that list of goals, you will see a major resurgence in the private sector the moment he's declared the winner. Employment will come roaring back. Billions of dollars being held in coffers by corporations because of their fear and uncertainty of how Obama's current initiative will impact them, and what he has up his sleeve for attacking them next, will start to get invested in growth opportunities. The newly surging economy will produce a spike in tax revenue inflow, which will help lower the runaway deficit.

The contrast this election between the courses these two men want to take is could not be more striking, or crucial.

Well off the top of your head I can tell you that Romney has already said that he would keep the big parts of Obamacare in place.

Don't forget Obamacare is just a watered down version of Romneycare, which he made law in MA.

And at least two of your points are the same thing. Possibly three or even 4.

[Ronin13]

If you think that then you really aren't listening.

- Cut taxes on business
- Slash regulations that are overwhelming small business people and stifling growth.
- Measures to repatriate corporate profits stuck over seas
- Get tough on China
- Unleash US energy exploration and development.
- Lower capital gains tax
- kill obama care.

That's just a short list off the top of my head. With that list of goals, you will see a major resurgence in the private sector the moment he's declared the winner. Employment will come roaring back. Billions of dollars being held in coffers by corporations because of their fear and uncertainty of how Obama's current initiative will impact them, and what he has up his sleeve for attacking them next, will start to get invested in growth opportunities. The newly surging economy will produce a spike in tax revenue inflow, which will help lower the runaway deficit.

The contrast this election between the courses these two men want to take is could not be more striking, or crucial.

Bravo, BP, you've framed the question perfectly. Luckily, it's a choice we don't really have to make, but there is a point to this thread.

Our country is at a crossroad. Too many voters are prioritizing smaller personal pet issues that benefit them, over the big picture issues that will determine the fate of the country. If the country falls, all the personal pet issues will suffer and fall along with it.

This thread was meant to give us a taste of having to sacrifice and put country first, in front of self. It's a choice many are going to have to face and take the high road on if we're to save ourselves. Especially true when half the country is not paying taxes, becoming more and more dependent on the crumbs thrown to them by a government seeking to enslave them.

WHO ARE YOU!? I need to come down to woodland park and buy you a beer!
I underlined the points that are spot on... I couldn't agree more, and with the emotional, void of logic thinking that the left excretes out of their minds and pie holes is just appalling and shameful. They can't look at the bigger picture and see what's better for the nation as a whole, they only think what would be better for their lazy, moronic selves.

[Kmanbay]

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastMan
If you think that then you really aren't listening.

- Cut taxes on business
- Slash regulations that are overwhelming small business people and stifling growth.
- Measures to repatriate corporate profits stuck over seas
- Get tough on China
- Unleash US energy exploration and development.
- Lower capital gains tax
- kill obama care.

That's just a short list off the top of my head. With that list of goals, you will see a major resurgence in the private sector the moment he's declared the winner. Employment will come roaring back. Billions of dollars being held in coffers by corporations because of their fear and uncertainty of how Obama's current initiative will impact them, and what he has up his sleeve for attacking them next, will start to get invested in growth opportunities. The newly surging economy will produce a spike in tax revenue inflow, which will help lower the runaway deficit.

The contrast this election between the courses these two men want to take is could not be more striking, or crucial.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastMan
Bravo, BP, you've framed the question perfectly. Luckily, it's a choice we don't really have to make, but there is a point to this thread.

Our country is at a crossroad. Too many voters are prioritizing smaller personal pet issues that benefit them, over the big picture issues that will determine the fate of the country. If the country falls, all the personal pet issues will suffer and fall along with it.

This thread was meant to give us a taste of having to sacrifice and put country first, in front of self. It's a choice many are going to have to face and take the high road on if we're to save ourselves. Especially true when half the country is not paying taxes, becoming more and more dependent on the crumbs thrown to them by a government seeking to enslave them.

WHO ARE YOU!? I need to come down to woodland park and buy you a beer!
I underlined the points that are spot on... I couldn't agree more, and with the emotional, void of logic thinking that the left excretes out of their minds and pie holes is just appalling and shameful. They can't look at the bigger picture and see what's better for the nation as a whole, they only think what would be better for their lazy, moronic selves.
__________________


I believe Romey is the clear choice this time because of the economy. Cutting the capital gains tax is a bad idea in my mind. It only benefits those who independantly invest, unlike the majority of us who have to run it through a 401k. We see none of the benefits.

Obama hasn't done anything about gun control because he saved it for his second term, Romney won't do anything about gun control because he will want a second term.

If we get enough congressmen and women who are pro gun it won't be an issue. Our two senators are not very pro gun, but neither is up for reelection this time.

Biger than the next four years is the make up of the SCOTUS for the next 10-25 years. Obama has shown he will nominate extremely liberal justices, can we afford one or two more?

[Rust_shackleford]

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastMan
If you think that then you really aren't listening.

- Cut taxes on business
- Slash regulations that are overwhelming small business people and stifling growth.
- Measures to repatriate corporate profits stuck over seas
- Get tough on China
- Unleash US energy exploration and development.
- Lower capital gains tax
- kill obama care.

That's just a short list off the top of my head. With that list of goals, you will see a major resurgence in the private sector the moment he's declared the winner. Employment will come roaring back. Billions of dollars being held in coffers by corporations because of their fear and uncertainty of how Obama's current initiative will impact them, and what he has up his sleeve for attacking them next, will start to get invested in growth opportunities. The newly surging economy will produce a spike in tax revenue inflow, which will help lower the runaway deficit.

The contrast this election between the courses these two men want to take is could not be more striking, or crucial.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastMan
Bravo, BP, you've framed the question perfectly. Luckily, it's a choice we don't really have to make, but there is a point to this thread.

Our country is at a crossroad. Too many voters are prioritizing smaller personal pet issues that benefit them, over the big picture issues that will determine the fate of the country. If the country falls, all the personal pet issues will suffer and fall along with it.

This thread was meant to give us a taste of having to sacrifice and put country first, in front of self. It's a choice many are going to have to face and take the high road on if we're to save ourselves. Especially true when half the country is not paying taxes, becoming more and more dependent on the crumbs thrown to them by a government seeking to enslave them.

WHO ARE YOU!? I need to come down to woodland park and buy you a beer!
I underlined the points that are spot on... I couldn't agree more, and with the emotional, void of logic thinking that the left excretes out of their minds and pie holes is just appalling and shameful. They can't look at the bigger picture and see what's better for the nation as a whole, they only think what would be better for their lazy, moronic selves.
__________________


I believe Romey is the clear choice this time because of the economy. Cutting the capital gains tax is a bad idea in my mind. It only benefits those who independantly invest, unlike the majority of us who have to run it through a 401k. We see none of the benefits.

Obama hasn't done anything about gun control because he saved it for his second term, Romney won't do anything about gun control because he will want a second term.

If we get enough congressmen and women who are pro gun it won't be an issue. Our two senators are not very pro gun, but neither is up for reelection this time.

Biger than the next four years is the make up of the SCOTUS for the next 10-25 years. Obama has shown he will nominate extremely liberal justices, can we afford one or two more?

great theory. However Romney signed Massachusetts "assault weapons" ban.
Obama's base is anti gun.

[BPTactical]

great theory. However Romney signed Massachusetts "assault weapons" ban.
Obama's base is anti gun.

True, but Mittens would have a little tougher road to hoe Federally

[Kmanbay]

great theory. However Romney signed Massachusetts "assault weapons" ban.
Obama's base is anti gun.

I hope and pray Romney doesn't go that way if/when he becomes president. It is so tough to tell where they stand on 2A and assault weapons. Hopefully the congress won't pass the law, so we don't have to worry about a signature from the presidant, no matter who it is.

[Rucker61]

I believe Romey is the clear choice this time because of the economy.

Google "DJIA ten year history" and "corporate profits sixty years" and let me know what you find. Look up "trickle down" while you're at it.

[Irving]

I believe Romey is the clear choice this time because of the economy. Cutting the capital gains tax is a bad idea in my mind. It only benefits those who independantly invest, unlike the majority of us who have to run it through a 401k. We see none of the benefits.

So what?