
Originally Posted by
Sawin
I have one concern to add to this discussion.
From an outsiders (non2A's) perspective, I have a feeling that a lot of the general sheeple will think that having armed security or teachers with guns at the school could be reflective of a "police state" where there are armed men on every corner. I understand the difference here, obviously, since we're talking about every-day citizens, but imagine for a moment if someone other than the 2A supporters said "We need armed security 24/7 and we have the men to do it"... Maybe the government for instance? What would our reaction be if BO said, "No problem NRA. Instead of you guys spending your money to make this happen, I'll cover it, and my properly trained men will protect our children, not some untrained civilians." How would that make you feel?
Imagine how the lefties feel considering the NRA's men are looked upon with disgust. Don't we get disgusted by BO and his men? For this reason, I don't see this being successful. As much as I agree with the premise that responsible gun owners save lives, I don't want the tides to turn and some Gov't douche to put their pawns in our schools instead of regular local cops and responsible teachers/principles, etc.