Obama. He has less of a record, is to the left of Hillary, and would be harder to beat in November. The guy is a mirage. How he has made it this far is beyond me.
Obama. He has less of a record, is to the left of Hillary, and would be harder to beat in November. The guy is a mirage. How he has made it this far is beyond me.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
They are both terrible...but I would rather have Obama over Hillary. You know she had to of been the mastermind of Bill's AW ban. That guy can speak and she can think...thats about it.
But, she won't win because this country doesn't want a female pres. Nobody wants to talk about history and say President Clinton, and then go...which one, the chick or the dude?
Obama is a worthless POS as well because of his ideas...but due to him being less experienced than the old hag, I think he won't go too deep into the pool. If he gets in and then go re-elected 4 years down the road, then we should be quivering.
I'm more afraid of Hillary - I think Obama would be a weak president with too many ideas and not enough details to get anything passed.
Even though the majority of the country hates her guts, I wouldn't be surprised if Clinton had enough dirt or leverage of some kind to get her pet projects passed, whereas I think congress will mostly ignore Obama.
It's worth noting that I'm usually wrong when trying to figure out democrats.
Remember that President Bush said he would sign a reauthorization of the AWB if Congress passed it, so I really think our only hope is in retaking the House and Senate.
A plan is just a list of things that don't happen.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
all possible choices scare me... including the republicrat choice....
Although if i had to choose between turd and wet turd i'd have to go with turd which ='s Clinton