Close
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Fort Collins
    Posts
    194

    Default

    Pretty sure the back story was the guy was using his car in a business aspect which is a no go no matter what your line of work is, that's why they have commercial policies.

  2. #2
    Gong Shooter griebel303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Thornton
    Posts
    426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mpatch View Post
    Pretty sure the back story was the guy was using his car in a business aspect which is a no go no matter what your line of work is, that's why they have commercial policies.
    I heard the same a week or so back

  3. #3
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mpatch View Post
    Pretty sure the back story was the guy was using his car in a business aspect which is a no go no matter what your line of work is, that's why they have commercial policies.
    I don't even have to know the back story to know this is true. This is clearly a commercial policy that does not meet the underwriting standards for whatever business exposure in which this person or company is engaging. In order to even cancel a policy, the person purchasing the policy would have had to have basically lied in order to get it written in the first place. Insurance companies can't just go around canceling policies willy nilly. There are very specific circumstances in which a policy can be canceled. The one that most of you are more familiar with is non-payment.

    Ronin, as an agent, you should know better.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner th3w01f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mpatch View Post
    Pretty sure the back story was the guy was using his car in a business aspect which is a no go no matter what your line of work is, that's why they have commercial policies.
    If the letter is legit (no idea) then this doesn’t make sense. The letter would just saying something about using the vehicle for "business purposes" and not mention weapons.

    I find the use of the term 'weapons industry' suspect, does that mean you can't have GEICO if you work for Lockheed?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •