I understand voting for the constituition in its origional value, but what you aren't seeing is obama wants to using that same piece of paper written by the founding fathers and use it as a living document.
that means "change" to be exact. His whole idea is change. He can interpret the constitution for what it means in HIS MIND, for todays world. What is basically boils down to is he doesn't agree with the heller case. if that goes down, what comes next. all of a sudden you have to be part of the military or LEO to own a firearm? (or at least a decent one that isn't a black powder or flintlock)
When I say to spite the republicans because they put up a crappy candidate in your mind, i mean exactly that. I wish it was someone other than McCain, but at least he isn't obama. Whenever I vote i have to look at it in two ways. There is 2 of them that have a chance at winning and only 1 will win. thats the first.
next I have to think about the lesser of 2 evils. I care about my liberties and my country first. Guns are at the top of the list, and right up there is taxes and freedom of speech. The liberals seem to think only they have the freedom of speech. This can be seen by the upcoming obama visit to CSU where they don't allow signs or banners. I am considering taking one up there because that is a direct violation of freedom of speech if they enforce that.
I can easily say that a 3rd party candidate has a lot more of my values and best interests in his campaign, but i have to look at my first issue of voting and who actually has a chance.
In the end, no body cares or remembers about the 3rd party candidate and more often than not it is the reason the republicans end up losing because of a small percent. another reason i call it spiteful to vote for a 3rd party.




Reply With Quote
