SB256 will allow any town or county to ban legal concealed carry

[Bitter Clinger]

SB256 will allow any town or county to ban legal concealed carry. Your CCW permit may no longer be valid in CO

full text

LLS NO. 21-0940.01 Conrad Imel x2313
INTRODUCED SENATE BILL 21-256
Fenberg and Moreno,
Hooton and Daugherty, McCormick
First Regular Session Seventy-third General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO
SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
Senate Committees House Committees
State, Veterans, & Military Affairs
101 102
A BILL FOR AN ACT
CONCERNING PERMITTING REGULATION OF FIREARMS BY LOCAL
GOVERNING BODIES.
Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)
The bill declares that the regulation of firearms is a matter of state and local concern. Existing law prohibits a local government from enacting an ordinance, regulation, or other law that prohibits the sale, purchase, or possession of a firearm. The bill permits a local government to enact an ordinance, regulation, or other law governing or prohibiting the sale, purchase, transfer, or possession of a firearm, ammunition, or
Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statute. Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.

firearm component or accessory that is not less restrictive than state laws governing the sale, purchase, transfer, or possession of the firearm, ammunition, or firearm component or accessory.
Existing law prohibits a local government from enacting an ordinance or resolution that conflicts with state law regarding concealed carry of handguns. The bill permits a local government, including a special district, and governing board of an institution of higher education to enact an ordinance, resolution, rule, or other regulation that prohibits a permittee from carrying a concealed handgun in a building or specific area within the local government's or governing board's jurisdiction.
1 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
2 SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 29-11.7-101, amend
3 (1)(d), (1)(e), and (2); and repeal (1)(f) and (1)(g) as follows:
4 29-11.7-101. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly
5 hereby finds that:
6 (d) There exists a widespread inconsistency among jurisdictions
7 within the state with regard to firearms regulations; THE STATE HAS AN
8 INTEREST IN THE REGULATION OF FIREARMS DUE TO THE EASE OF
9 TRANSPORTING FIREARMS BETWEEN LOCAL JURISDICTIONS; AND
10 (e) This inconsistency among local government laws regulating
11 lawful firearm possession and ownership has extraterritorial impact on
12 state citizens and the general public by subjecting them to criminal and
13 civil penalties in some jurisdictions for conduct wholly lawful in other
14 jurisdictions; OFFICIALS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE UNIQUELY
15 EQUIPPED TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS AS TO REGULATIONS NECESSARY IN
16 THEIR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS.
17 (f) Inconsistency among local governments of laws regulating the
18 possession and ownership of firearms results in persons being treated
19 differently under the law solely on the basis of where they reside, and a
20 person's residence in a particular county or city or city and county is not
-2- SB21-256


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
a rational classification when it is the basis for denial of equal treatment under the law;
(g) This inconsistency places citizens in the position of not knowing when they may be violating the local laws and therefore being unable to avoid violating the law and becoming subject to criminal and other penalties.
(2) Based on the findings specified in subsection (1) of this section, the general assembly concludes that THE REGULATION OF FIREARMS IS A MATTER OF STATE AND LOCAL CONCERN.
(a) The regulation of firearms is a matter of statewide concern;
(b) It is necessary to provide statewide laws concerning the possession and ownership of a firearm to ensure that law-abiding persons are not unfairly placed in the position of unknowingly committing crimes involving firearms.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 29-11.7-101.5 as follows:
29-11.7-101.5. Definitions. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE 11.7, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(1) "FIREARM COMPONENT OR ACCESSORY" MEANS AN ITEM CONTAINED IN, USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH, OR MOUNTED TO A FIREARM. (2) "LOCAL GOVERNMENT" MEANS A STATUTORY OR HOME RULE
CITY AND COUNTY, COUNTY, CITY, OR TOWN.
SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 29-11.7-103
as follows:
29-11.7-103. Local regulations governing firearms permitted.
UNLESS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED PURSUANT TO STATE LAW, a local government may not enact an ordinance, regulation, or other law
-3- SB21-256


1 that prohibits GOVERNING OR PROHIBITING the sale, purchase, TRANSFER,
2 or possession of a firearm, AMMUNITION, OR FIREARM COMPONENT OR
3 ACCESSORY that a person may lawfully sell, purchase, TRANSFER, or
4 possess under state or federal law. THE LOCAL ORDINANCE, REGULATION,
5 OR OTHER LAW MAY NOT IMPOSE A REQUIREMENT ON THE SALE,
6 PURCHASE, TRANSFER, OR POSSESSION OF A FIREARM, AMMUNITION, OR
7 FIREARM COMPONENT OR ACCESSORY THAT IS LESS RESTRICTIVE THAN
8 STATE LAW, AND any such LESS RESTRICTIVE ordinance, regulation, or
9 other law enacted by a local government prior to March 18, 2003 BEFORE
10 THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, AS AMENDED IN 2021, is void and
11 unenforceable.
12 SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-201, amend
13 (1) and (2) as follows:
14 18-12-201. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly
15 finds that:
16 (a) There exists a widespread inconsistency among jurisdictions
17 within the state with regard to the issuance of permits to carry concealed
18 handguns; and identification of areas of the state where it is lawful to
19 carry concealed handguns;
20 (b) This inconsistency among jurisdictions creates public
21 uncertainty regarding the areas of the state in which it is lawful to carry
22 concealed handguns;
23 (c) Inconsistency REGARDING ISSUANCE OF PERMITS results in the
24 arbitrary and capricious denial of permits to carry concealed handguns
25 based on the jurisdiction of residence rather than the qualifications for
26 obtaining a permit;
27 (d) The criteria and procedures for the lawful carrying of
-4- SB21-256

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
concealed handguns historically has been regulated by state statute and should be consistent throughout the state to ensure the consistent implementation of state law; and OFFICIALS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE UNIQUELY EQUIPPED TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS AS TO WHERE CONCEALED HANDGUNS CAN BE CARRIED IN THEIR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS; AND
(e) It is necessary that the state occupy the field of regulation of the bearing of concealed handguns since the issuance of a ISSUING concealed handgun permit is based on a person's constitutional right of self-protection and PERMITS BECAUSE there is a prevailing state interest in ensuring that no citizen is arbitrarily denied a concealed handgun permit. and in ensuring that the laws controlling the use of the permit are consistent throughout the state.
(2) Based on the findings specified in subsection (1) of this section, the general assembly hereby concludes that:
(a) The permitting and carrying of THE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR ISSUING PERMITS TO CARRY concealed handguns is a matter of statewide concern; and
(b) It is necessary to provide statewide uniform standards for issuing permits to carry concealed handguns for self-defense; AND
(c) WHETHER CONCEALED HANDGUNS CAN BE CARRIED IN A SPECIFIC AREA IS A MATTER OF STATE AND LOCAL CONCERN.
SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-214, amend (1)(a); and add (1)(c), (2.5), and (3.5) as follows:
18-12-214. Authority granted by permit - carrying restrictions - local authority. (1) (a) A permit to carry a concealed handgun authorizes the permittee to carry a concealed handgun in all areas of the state, except as specifically limited in this section. A permit does not
-5- SB21-256


1 authorize the permittee to use a handgun in a manner that would violate
2 a provision of state law. A local government does not have authority to
3 adopt or enforce an ordinance or resolution that would conflict with any
4 provision of this part 2.
5 (c)(I) ALOCALGOVERNMENT,INCLUDINGASPECIALDISTRICT,OR
6 THE GOVERNING BOARD OF AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY
7 ENACT AN ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, RULE, OR OTHER REGULATION THAT
8 PROHIBITS A PERMITTEE FROM CARRYING A CONCEALED HANDGUN IN A
9 BUILDING OR SPECIFIC AREA WITHIN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S OR
10 GOVERNING BOARD'S JURISDICTION.
11 (II) IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNING BOARD PROHIBITS
12 CARRYING A CONCEALED HANDGUN IN A BUILDING OR SPECIFIC AREA, THE
13 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNING BOARD SHALL POST SIGNS AT THE
14 PUBLIC ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING OR SPECIFIC AREA INFORMING
15 PERSONS THAT CARRYING A CONCEALED HANDGUN IS PROHIBITED IN THE
16 BUILDING OR SPECIFIC AREA. THE NOTICE REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION MAY
17 BE INCLUDED ON A SIGN DESCRIBING OPEN CARRY RESTRICTIONS POSTED
18 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 29-11.7-104.
19 (2.5) A PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS PART 2 DOES NOT
20 AUTHORIZE A PERSON TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN INTO A PLACE
21 WHERE THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED HANDGUNS IS PROHIBITED BY A
22 LOCAL ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, RULE, OR OTHER REGULATION.
23 (3.5) A PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS PART 2 DOES NOT
24 AUTHORIZE A PERSON TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN ONTO THE REAL
25 PROPERTY, OR INTO ANY IMPROVEMENTS ERECTED THEREON, OF A PUBLIC
26 COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY IF THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED HANDGUNS IS
27 PROHIBITED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY.
-6- SB21-256


1 2 3
SECTION 6. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.
-7- SB21-256

https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/defau...21a_256_01.pdf

[Bitter Clinger]

This is horsecrap

[Great-Kazoo]

Different title for thread, but same one regarding the bill

https://www.ar-15.co/threads/183602-...Carry-Finished

[XJ]

In before "reasonable Democrat"

[.455_Hunter]

I posted the other thread. I wonder what traction this is actually getting. There are D legislative members with permits, and several D members supported the original 2003 bill.

It is also a viable position to support mag restrictions, safe storage and red flag while still supporting concealed carry. We might not agree, but it still a reasonable thought process.

The hypocrisy of only this topic being suitable for local control and only in a more restrictive manner is also probably not lost on some of them.

It would be also interesting for them to articulate what widespread incidents justify a mass contraction of CC besides the fact the progressive activists don't like it.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Who knows with today politicians.

All it would take is some mountain town on 70 to pass a no gun law and you effective banned people from traveling with a gun. Same for I-25, maybe even more so. Or who knows what Denver would pass, with being the cross roads of 25 and 70...

I don’t know the politics on it but it seems like this may be a really good bludgeon to get compromises on other things. Polis is a technocrat at heart. I don’t see him passing this because he knows it would lead to all kinds of problems.

[hollohas]

Raise of hands for who thinks this WON'T pass?

After what we saw when we got railroaded as the mag ban and private party transfer passed, my guess is we're fucked. Any optimism I had is gone.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Denver is home rule, why hasn't it outlawed CCW? I thought that CCW was different? Granted, I think they'll keep pushing the 'AWB' thing down in round count. But I would think if CCW could be taken away, Denver would have done it by now. That doesn't mean that there couldn't be all kinds of permitting, round count and other silliness.


I feel totally cheated. My wife grew up here and told me stories about great weather and a conservative state. We moved here in 2005, just in time for the housing stupidity, followed by a rush through purple to red and we are now close to the worst gun laws in the country. At the same time I don't know what is soaring faster, housing prices or crime. Grew up in the midwest, lots of lakes. But here, after you fight the I70 traffic that is year round now, what does it take to get a cabin on a lake- and that overgrown pond that is Grand Lake is the only body of water that you can be sure will be at the shore. Got a few million for a cabin on the water up there?

CO is going full CA stupid FAST, and all the hipsters think it is awesome, until they can't buy anything.

I can deal with the crazy housing prices, I can sit in traffic, I can hold my tongue while my intellectual and moral inferiors talk about how evil white people are. What I can't stand is to be constantly threatened with prison time and fines for just owning pieces of plastic and metal. While people scream at me that I have blood on my hands, when all I have is CLP and powder- and their solutions never seem to solve the problem and the blood piles up on their hands through stupid actions that attack the law abiding.

What an Fing mess.t'

Colorado has broken its promise and its value proposition. I'd rather live in Ohio, or Michigan. That's saying something. Sure, CO has low humidity, but it high in stupidity.

[matttahoe53]

Denver is home rule, why hasn't it outlawed CCW? I thought that CCW was different? Granted, I think they'll keep pushing the 'AWB' thing down in round count. But I would think if CCW could be taken away, Denver would have done it by now. That doesn't mean that there couldn't be all kinds of permitting, round count and other silliness.


I feel totally cheated. My wife grew up here and told me stories about great weather and a conservative state. We moved here in 2005, just in time for the housing stupidity, followed by a rush through purple to red and we are now close to the worst gun laws in the country. At the same time I don't know what is soaring faster, housing prices or crime. Grew up in the midwest, lots of lakes. But here, after you fight the I70 traffic that is year round now, what does it take to get a cabin on a lake- and that overgrown pond that is Grand Lake is the only body of water that you can be sure will be at the shore. Got a few million for a cabin on the water up there?

CO is going full CA stupid FAST, and all the hipsters think it is awesome, until they can't buy anything.

I can deal with the crazy housing prices, I can sit in traffic, I can hold my tongue while my intellectual and moral inferiors talk about how evil white people are. What I can't stand is to be constantly threatened with prison time and fines for just owning pieces of plastic and metal. While people scream at me that I have blood on my hands, when all I have is CLP and powder- and their solutions never seem to solve the problem and the blood piles up on their hands through stupid actions that attack the law abiding.

What an Fing mess.t'

Colorado has broken its promise and its value proposition. I'd rather live in Ohio, or Michigan. That's saying something. Sure, CO has low humidity, but it high in stupidity.

As someone who grew up in Michigan and Ohio I agree with everything. I?ve been here a little over three years and am on my out. I?ve got no reason to stay. It?s sad to see the west dying.

[thedave1164]

Sure, CO has low humidity, but it high in stupidity.

Had to quote this