Even Hawkins hasn't been able to come to a supported theory on this. There is currently only conjecture and ideas. Some say yes there is a limit, but that begs the question; then what's outside the universe?
Printable View
No gas, no light, no molecules or matter of any kind but it must be "something" or else how could it contain our universe? I see your point. Mind boggling indeed.
My brain can't handle these types of abstract questions. I had a Physics professor that once started to talk about black holes, worm holes, etc. Fascinating but really my brain wanted to shutdown due to overload...cannot compute...(you have to read that last part in your robot voice)
I think that the show Star Gate had a good idea for a hypothesis. I bring that up because its easy to explain in their way they presented it.
I will say that I am not sure the human mind is capable of understanding it. We just have not evolved that much.
But back to Stargate... they go into a theory with the way that the "ancients" had "Ascended" to a higher plane. They became energy without body form and moved onto another dimension. I think our interpretations of that through God, religion, heaven and hell, are similar but with a different name.
Hawkings alludes to that in some of his writings. But I admit I have not read much of his. He is not an easy read.
I think the fundamental problem with people not being to understand, if even only in concept, of a black hole is in the naming of it. The science community really screwed the pooch by naming it that, should have been just a "singularity" or some other name. I think more people would be able to wrap their heads around the idea if it was simply named something else.
A black "hole" is not a hole at all. It is a very large (millions to billions of solar masses) object. The mass is so large that it has enough gravity for light not to escape. and the mass is extremely compressed. For example, if the mass if the earth were to become the same density as a black hole, it would be about the size of a marble. Same mass, different density.
Enough of my geek speak!!! Its Obama's fault!!!!!! and Bushes fault!!!! Die commie/liberal/conservative/republican/democrat/whatever!!!!!!!!!
I need a towel boy... my brain just exploded and I'm drooling all over my desk... Ouch that hurts! hollohas, I know how you feel now, and I watch a shitton of that show the Universe... I think I'm going to try to quote that on this subject sometime soon, instead of nynco spouting off about Star Gate like some 14 year old nerd living in his mom's basement... sorry nynco, I wasn't trying to insult you, but I have to say it: Stargate!? You're addressing complex astrophysics with a fucking sci-fi/fantasy show? It's un-scientific based fiction... that's like General Schwartzkopf going to war with Iraq in 1991 using Robert Heinlien as his tactical inspiration. Doesn't work.
Hawking did state that the infinite expanse would be impossible to calculate for us being such a small speck in the wide spectrum of the universe, so I think that explains his lack of theory on the matter, because theory is impossible if it's infinite. You cannot physically calculate infinity, it's not possible so therefore if the universe is infinite we would never be able to tell because you couldn't prove or disprove something so big (that's really the only word I can come up with) and just taking time to measure it would be more than the entire existence of an entire species... we're talking sextillion years here minimum (that's 10 to the 21st power -21 0's). Okay, I need to go put myself on O2 now...
Propane is the only way to grill. As Hank Hill says taste the meat not the heat.[Beer]
Yup, agreed. They called it a hole because that's what it looks like...A hole in the universe. But that type of mass and density is outside our comprehension. How the F is something so massive that even light can't escape it's gravity? And why the F does a star that runs out of fuel turn into that? Why? Why! cannot compute (robot voice again)
Anchovies![Pepsi]
42
Why is it called tourist season if we can't shoot them?
Sign at a topless bar
NO SHIRT
No Shoes
No Service
WTF?
Braille in the drive through ATM?
[Flower]
(My thoughts were of how to de-rail a train wreck.....)
I heard DSB Outdoors got into a 3-way last weekend!!!!![NoEvil]
Not a Fan of monkeys,,, I like bears.
Hey the bike that just left for Sturgis from our shop has Elephant hide for a seat...
His reference to Stargate wasn't related to complex astrophysics, it was in relation to religion and spiritual beliefs expressed through the show. It's an analogy by comparison to a TV series that ran for like 17 years.
I think what you're trying to get at is called Grahams Number:Quote:
Hawking did state that the infinite expanse would be impossible to calculate for us being such a small speck in the wide spectrum of the universe, so I think that explains his lack of theory on the matter, because theory is impossible if it's infinite. You cannot physically calculate infinity, it's not possible so therefore if the universe is infinite we would never be able to tell because you couldn't prove or disprove something so big (that's really the only word I can come up with) and just taking time to measure it would be more than the entire existence of an entire species... we're talking sextillion years here minimum (that's 10 to the 21st power -21 0's). Okay, I need to go put myself on O2 now...
The question of universal expansion, of whether or not we live in a runaway universe that will eventually die cold; or one in which gravity eventually wins, collapsing back on itself in a implosion of all the matter and mass, all the black holes and stars, galaxies and dark matter piling back into one spot is an interesting question. Where's that grammar nazi to flag my runaway sentence?Quote:
Graham's number is unimaginably larger than other well-known large numbers such as a googol, googolplex, and even larger than Skewes' number and Moser's number. Indeed, the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies at least one Planck volume. Even power towers of the form http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/9...3bf29b4899.png are useless for this purpose
I think that question is almost philosophical in nature. It currently seems the evidence points to a runaway universe, where everything is getting farther away at a faster rate. This would indicate that the big bang was a one time event, which makes it an anomaly. I somewhat prefer the concept of an eventual collapse, as it seems like bringing all the mass of the universe back to a single point would have to be something like a repeat of the big bang, a reset of the universe -- and quite possibly changes to the laws of physics.
Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number
I like tater tots
House hunt = annoying. DO the people trying to sell their house not realize that when 4 houses around you sold for 80k less than what you're listing for .. you're not going to sell... and you're a damn fool if you think I can't see what you purchased the house for 2 years ago and just because you threw some paint on the walls you expect to make a 90% profit.. F U..
That's how house hunting is going. /facepalm..
Yes.. I still plan on going to the fun show. I really wanna go punch holes in paper atm.
Astrophysics,black holes, tater tots, barbacues,female boobs, my head hurts..........[Help]
I like pickles.
Nice avatar there Mopar. You got one?
4Runner's are good, reliable SUVs... but you should really talk her into the new Durango- those are sick! I wish I could have one, but I opted to sell my 2000 Durango and upgrade to the BMW 3Series.... still have my Ran 1500 though so I'm not a total traitor! MOPAR4LIFE! Hey mopar, please tell me at least one of your duallys has this sticker:
http://www.vinyl-decals.com/prodimag...ing-chevys.gif
Salad: It's what food eats!
I'm relatively new to the forum, but its quickly becoming one of my vices.
You are a bunch of great guys and gals and entertaining as hell.[Beer]