Printable View
You seem locked on to "invasion of privacy" concerning the teacher looking into the kid's backpack. I'd be thankful the teacher found the gun and secured it before there was a serious incident either at school or before and after school. We are talking kindergarten age here. [Bang]Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
Interesting thought you have there...Quote:
Originally Posted by Elhuero
18-6-401 Child Abuse
(1)(a) A person commits child abuse if such person causes an injury to a child's life or health, or permits a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation that poses a threat of injury to the child's life or health, or engages in a continued pattern of conduct that results in malnourishment, lack of proper care, cruel punishment, mistreatment, or an accumulation of injuries that ulitmately results in the death of a child or serious bodily injury to a child.
How about letting your kid play sports? Football? Hockey?
18-12-108.7 Unlawfully providing or permitting a juvenile to possess a handgun
(1)(a) Any person who intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly provides a handgun with or without remuneration to any person under the age of eighteen years in violation of section 18-12-108.5 or any person who knows of such juvenile's conduct which violates section 18-12-108.5 and fails to make reasonable efforts to prevent such violation commits the crime of unlawfully providing a handgun to a juvenile or permitting a juvenile to possess a handgun.
I don't want you guys to get the wrong idea here. I don't think that the invasion of privacy issue is the most important at all. I take a stance like Blondie, in that a gun in a back pack isn't really a danger and it was totally over blown. It's not even really an invasion of privacy either, because as Bear said, students don't have any rights.
That's just the question I have, because I don't have questions about the other things. I can already tell the parents are dummies.
Still have news crews here. 9 earlier, 4 is here now. gee whiz, you'd think the story is over.
Picture of the "parent" on this story:
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15902163
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/liv...s%7Ep1.jpg
"... found to be a chrome .22 cal. LR Pheonix Arms Model HP22.... There was no bullet loaded in the chamber of the handgun, but the magazine that was loaded in the handgun contained 7 bullets."
Looks like a fine upstanding,,,,er uh Yeah...
I've been thinking for a few days that this vegan friend that we have is guilty of child abuse with all her stupid ass restrictions on her kid's diet. I don't know about you guys, but if my lunch was peanut butter jelly, crackers, pretzels, and animal crackers, EVERY SINGLE DAY, I probably wouldn't eat my lunch either.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneGuy67
/totally unwarranted and misplaced rant.
That pic says it all...See him around, "knock him the Fuck out" for usen his kids backpak...Dumbass[Rant1]
Cases in which I Can see this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elhuero
Someone in the vehicle is smoking.
Child is not properly Seated/Restrained.
Driver is operating the vehicle in an unsafe manner
Other than that, there is the whole "reasonable" Argument.
No More Backpacks.
it's for the children!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtn.man
In some places kids have to have clear plastic book bags......