You can't make this up.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2092861901001/
About 2:25 in The Rev addresses the issue that Semi-Autos are a threat to national security, because they can shoot down aircraft.
Printable View
You can't make this up.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2092861901001/
About 2:25 in The Rev addresses the issue that Semi-Autos are a threat to national security, because they can shoot down aircraft.
delete
Didn't you see Mark Wahlberg shoot down that attack helicopter in Shooter with his bolt action sniper rifle? This sheeet's dangerous man!
[ROFL1]
The Rev =[pileoshit]. Always was and always will be..No one takes this clown serious.
Hell, a muzzleloader can take out an EWO in an A6!
Didn't you see "Flight of the Intruder"???[eek]
Holmes was near the airport runways, and could shoot down airplanes? Wow. And how old is that fool? He can still barely speak legible English?
And he sure as hell didn't want to touch the matter of gun violence in Chicago vs. all the gun laws & rules there. He went in BIG circles around that one.
Did he have a stroke or something? Fox needed subtitles on that interview.
Did I hear right at about 5:00 where he was saying teachers shouldn't have guns because they might have mental issues? Why would you want them around the kids anyway then?
This guy makes me embarrassed to be from Chicago. He was/is/always will be a fool.
Sadly, a lot of people do take him serious. The reason I found this clip, was a co-worker was talking about how "she heard on the news that Holmes could have shot down a plane" and she was shocked you can own a weapon that could do that.
At first I thought she was kidding.
semi-auto capable of shooting down a plane is possible highly improbable but possible, horrible argument, but possible
Possible but sort of like winning the lottery. The odds are massively against it but someone wins.
Here's a WWII story about a pilot shooting a Jap plane down with a 1911: http://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/...shot-1911-ever
Those were very special conditions.
There's no doubt a semi- auto rifle, or any rifle really, could take down an airplane. Now HITTING it might be a challenge......
As a former Chicagoan, I feel the same way.
How many Civil Rights leaders do you know, that are multi-millionaires ? http://www.celebritynetworth.com/ric...son-net-worth/
Feeding off the very people they pretend to be helping.
Pretty sure birds do more dmg to planes than a semi auto.
I could be wrong maybe the media is just keeping those stories off the air.. you know don't want anymore crazies getting ideas like that.
- sent by the free-range electronic weasel attached to my hip.
So wait, Chicago's problems are poverty, drugs, racism and guns? Why isn't he spending more energy on the first three?
Semi autos can shoot down airplanes. That would be [ROFL2] if it weren't so adsurd. Then again, it is a proven fact that box cutters can bring down planes. [Roll1]
Never let the facts get in the way of a good rant.
You guys are missing the point, it's not the bullet that will take down a plane, but the "illegal" green targeting laser.
SOURCE: http://www.laserpointersafety.com/ru...ws/uslaws.html
Excerpt:
U.S.C. TITLE 18, CHAPTER 2
Sec. 39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft
(a) OFFENSE -- Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
The closest runway at DIA has to be at least 12 miles away from that theater...
Come on Rev., we're not buying that one today!
Jesse Jackson, that guy is still around?! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...s/facepalm.gif
Of course, planes can always be damaged by "Human Error"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwP_PSNxsf8
The issue with lasers is not damage to the aircraft, it's blinding the pilots. The pilots that have suffered permanent eye injuries appear to have had lasers stronger than pointers aimed at them but even laser pointers (especially green) can blind them long enough to create critical issues (especially if they were on approach).
So follow this logic:
- Chicago has some of the toughest US gun laws to date
- Chicago has one of the highest gun violence/gun murder rates in the US
- Most offenders already have a criminal history
- Our legistators want to fix the issues with MORE laws?
Is this because:
- The laws are insuficient ? - Nahhh
- The laws are not being enforced ? - Maybe
- Criminals don't care about laws; only honest citizens do ? - Ding Ding Ding Ding !!!!!
So in the end this will probably
- Increase the black market value on guns
- Allow only the "financially successful" drug lords and criminals to afford guns
- Assist the most "financially successful" drug lords in getting rid of their competiton
- Create more unarmed and defenseless gun violence candidates
- Maybe increase gun violence ?
You are correct, Sir. (Hopefully you realized it was an apparently "failed" attempt, on my part, at sarchasm...sorry!!!)
But...
A pilot, being unexpectedly blinded on approach, could possible not perform well if hit in the eye by a laser (especially those in the 550 nm range)...possibly causing a crash. Thus the guy "pointing" the laser will have effectively "taken down" the plane with a laser.
Anyone have any examples ?
I don't believe you. I'm from Chicago (Park Ridge) and no way I would live there again. The laws stink, the weather stinks, and the corruption (Blago, for instance) stinks.
I wouldn't move back either...
...and I'll give myself some of these and say sorry to the OP
[ontopic][ontopic][offtopic][offtopic]
Ye must believe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54WMpVDDiII