So now you are saying the administration took out (or arranged for) our own diplomat and 3 others to be murdered for a cover up? This seems far fetched to me. I would think the attack would have been better conceived if this were the case. Supposedly, he died of asphixiation; not the most assured method of assassination.
I am still unsure of what exactly this article is stating. Are they saying that the annex near the attacked consulate was raided during the attack and that is when the 400 missiles were stolen? If that is the case, it really does not make any sense as to why forces would have been withheld from fighting off the attack. This would have increased the liklihood of losing the missiles, and their existance and worse, origin eventually coming to light. If those missiles were in the annex and there were an attack, I would assume someone would have ordered an immense counter attack to ensure no one lived and none of those weapons made it out.




Reply With Quote
