RUFKM? Judge orders Colorado Cake Maker to serve gay couples

[Ah Pook]

Not feeling the love.

Some anonymous twat waffle walks into a bakery wanting lude quotes in bible shaped cakes. Then a year later decides to sue. Good for you. GTFO.

I don't care about the shops religious beliefs. It's their shop and their rules (within the bounds of established law). Don't like it? Leave.

There are more than enough bakers (and other gay friendly business') that will gladly take your business. This is nothing more than a frivolous lawsuit and, as usual, the bottom feeders pick it up and make it into news.

[rondog]

I have to ask - was this over a fudge cake?

[BPTactical]

I have to ask - was this over a fudge cake?

[RblDiver]

Not feeling the love.

Some anonymous twat waffle walks into a bakery wanting lude quotes in bible shaped cakes. Then a year later decides to sue. Good for you. GTFO.

I don't care about the shops religious beliefs. It's their shop and their rules (within the bounds of established law). Don't like it? Leave.

There are more than enough bakers (and other gay friendly business') that will gladly take your business. This is nothing more than a frivolous lawsuit and, as usual, the bottom feeders pick it up and make it into news.

In general, I'd agree with you. Shop owners shouldn't be forced to do squat they don't want to. However, so long as the Masterpiece case stands, I'm all for it. Perhaps it can get overturned.

[Dave_L]

Yeah, this is obviously just a troll trying to shake the apple cart. But after that first ruling against the baker refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding (due to religious beliefs), this should be interesting. Lots of comments seem to take the bakers side on this one in the name of "A business can refuse service to anyone" mantra. We waded into some very interesting waters with the original ruling.

[Guylee]

If this were my shop, I'd have given him a REASON to sue.

Thus why I will never be able to work in customer service...

[wctriumph]

Both are against Christian bakers for basically opposite reasons. Damned if you don't, damned if you don't.

WTF is wrong with people??

[Aloha_Shooter]

Sauce for the goose. I doubt this would ever have happened if the homosexual "rights" community hadn't pushed things with the first baker. The guy who did this must be a bit of an obnoxious arse but so am I and Azucar Bakery should blame the ACLU and the homosexual community for creating the situation for him to put her on the spot like this.

[68Charger]

Both are against Christian bakers for basically opposite reasons. Damned if you don't, damned if you don't.

WTF is wrong with people??

Seems to me there was some book that predicted this quite a few years back... oh yeah, here it is:

John 15:18-19:

¹⁸ “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. ¹⁹ If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. ²⁰ Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’^[a] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also.

I agree that they've created an interesting situation by forcing will upon a bakery for one situation- makes it difficult for them to not do the same thing in this situation, lest they are exposed as the hypocrites that they are. Maybe the ATF can help them to "redesign" their decision.

I'm also of the opinion that the baker should be able to tell anyone to pound sand... it's not like getting a cake is a constitutionally protected right- and even if it was, forcing somebody else to do it for you is where is breaks down.

[Aloha_Shooter]

I agree that they've created an interesting situation by forcing will upon a bakery for one situation- makes it difficult for them not to do the same thing, lest they are exposed as the hypocrites that they are. Maybe the ATF can help them to "redesign" their decision.

OTOH, it seems to me the liberals never cared much about being exposed as hypocrites. Somehow it rolls off their backs like water off a duck. They call Republicans racist then make a former KKK Grand Dragon their Senate Majority Leader, talk about income inequality and the rich operating by different rules while Dianne Feinstein's hubby gets special sole-source deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars for his company, make up BS "wars against women" while hiring fewer women and paying them less than the Republican opponent mocked for specifically looking for women to fill vacancies.

The mainstream media never holds them accountable or exposes the hypocrisy and they've taken over both the educational and judicial systems so why would they care?