Quote Originally Posted by SamuraiCO View Post
Interesting that "settled science" does not accept a scientific solution to the "problem" of CO2 warming up the planet. I posted before of the think tank in Seattle that was prominent in the last Freakonomics book. Their solution was to mimic a force of nature that with out a doubt cools the planet....volcanic eruptions. It is sulfur dioxide in the high atmosphere that does it every time there is volcanic activity. Their solution if the "climate change" models do come true and we start an uncontrollable atmospheric nightmare with increased temperatures costs around......$80 million with a $10-20 million a year investment to pump the gas and cool off our planet.

That's it. No $trillions of dollars needed and fundamental change in our current power production or needs. We can ill afford it now or in the short term future. Will there be some breakthrough energy source other than the most efficient solar model of burning of fossil fuels in our lifetime....maybe. But it has to be the same or cost less to make any sense at this time in our lifetime.

The national debt will ruin our country and the world economies well before any models of climate change will.
The EPA would undoubtedly block this plan, since it would lead to acid rain...