Ronin, I'm afraid the SCOTUS doesn't consider what it could to to prospective career paths... consider yourself lucky that this happened now and you can make an informed decision, rather than right after you did K9 training, and then the dept decided to lay off 1/2 the K9 force. (that's how it would work in Corporate America)
It's NOT a 4th amendment issue of "search" as they have decided- it's unlawful detention (seizure of their person)... based on limits of the police force, and not whether the individual has done anything wrong.
Last edited by 68Charger; 04-21-2015 at 16:33.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...
I wonder if this will effect interactions where police steal money from people just because someone had a lot of cash on them. I wouldn't think that it would.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Be courteous to one another.
Last and only warning.
That sounds very unfortunate that you had such a terrible experience with K9 units. I am in LE as well as I have several family members who are as well. One is actually a K9 officer as well. This is not a common experience with K9 handlers and most of the K9 officers I know are not guys who are "dog nazis" as you so kindly put it. These are people who are trying to ensure that drugs are not being trafficked accross the state. Just try to remember that we are trying to fight for the same team. I don't think that you'd want drug dealers running unchecked throughout the state.
As long as this doesn't interfere with reasonable suspicion or probable cause uses of K9 deployment, I don't see the issue. I am in LE and my duty has always been to the citizens of this state and country. I hope that this ruling doesn't make it more difficult for officers find those that are actually breaking drug laws.
I don't make the rules. I just think them up and write them down.