Close
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 60
  1. #11
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Most of the "k9's" are trained to "alert" when the cop gives a specific hand signal, or vocal command thereby allowing him to now search your vehicle based on a false PC, "because the dog alerted". Due to these dog nazis, your 4th amendment rights are already gone. They will circle the car and let the dog jump on the vehicle scratching the s--t out of your exterior and interior, and when they find nothing, tough s--t, you now have a damaged vehicle thanks to Johnny law, and you can't recover any compensation for the repairs. So what the SCOTUS ruled means nothing in the real world.
    Is your post based on extensive experience, or just stuff you read on the Internet?

  2. #12
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    I'm curious what the SCOTUS would say about reasonable suspicion -after the initial contact- that does not fulfill probable cause for a warrant, but instead would, as per most agencies policies, permit a dog sniff to confirm if drugs are present. This decision changes a lot about drug interdiction. I agree with Alito, if reasonable suspicion exists then a K9 deployment for a sniff (which *technically* doesn't violate the 4th amendment- as it is not entry into the vehicle) would be legal. Having an interest in becoming a K9 Deputy, this just makes my future position less effective.
    Ronin, I'm afraid the SCOTUS doesn't consider what it could to to prospective career paths... consider yourself lucky that this happened now and you can make an informed decision, rather than right after you did K9 training, and then the dept decided to lay off 1/2 the K9 force. (that's how it would work in Corporate America)
    It's NOT a 4th amendment issue of "search" as they have decided- it's unlawful detention (seizure of their person)... based on limits of the police force, and not whether the individual has done anything wrong.
    Last edited by 68Charger; 04-21-2015 at 16:33.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

  3. #13
    Varmiteer GunsRBadMMMMKay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Graves View Post
    As opposed too..?
    Kitties? http://www.madeupnews.com/feature/fe...42300_cat.html

  4. #14
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I wonder if this will effect interactions where police steal money from people just because someone had a lot of cash on them. I wouldn't think that it would.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    Experience. Go to you tube, there are videos there. Got a Colorado plate? Get ready for the B.S.

    Quote Originally Posted by hurley842002 View Post
    Is your post based on extensive experience, or just stuff you read on the Internet?

  6. #16
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Experience. Go to you tube, there are videos there. Got a Colorado plate? Get ready for the B.S.
    Okay, well I tend to not put much stock in folks who direct me to youtube for their argument.

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    westminster, co
    Posts
    524

    Default

    Well officer, I also said first hand experience.
    Quote Originally Posted by hurley842002 View Post
    Okay, well I tend to not put much stock in folks who direct me to youtube for their argument.

  8. #18
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Be courteous to one another.

    Last and only warning.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  9. #19
    Machine Gunner osok-308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,596

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
    Most of the "k9's" are trained to "alert" when the cop gives a specific hand signal, or vocal command thereby allowing him to now search your vehicle based on a false PC, "because the dog alerted". Due to these dog nazis, your 4th amendment rights are already gone. They will circle the car and let the dog jump on the vehicle scratching the s--t out of your exterior and interior, and when they find nothing, tough s--t, you now have a damaged vehicle thanks to Johnny law, and you can't recover any compensation for the repairs. So what the SCOTUS ruled means nothing in the real world.
    That sounds very unfortunate that you had such a terrible experience with K9 units. I am in LE as well as I have several family members who are as well. One is actually a K9 officer as well. This is not a common experience with K9 handlers and most of the K9 officers I know are not guys who are "dog nazis" as you so kindly put it. These are people who are trying to ensure that drugs are not being trafficked accross the state. Just try to remember that we are trying to fight for the same team. I don't think that you'd want drug dealers running unchecked throughout the state.

    As long as this doesn't interfere with reasonable suspicion or probable cause uses of K9 deployment, I don't see the issue. I am in LE and my duty has always been to the citizens of this state and country. I hope that this ruling doesn't make it more difficult for officers find those that are actually breaking drug laws.
    I don't make the rules. I just think them up and write them down.

  10. #20
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by osok-308 View Post
    That sounds very unfortunate that you had such a terrible experience with K9 units. I am in LE as well as I have several family members who are as well. One is actually a K9 officer as well. This is not a common experience with K9 handlers and most of the K9 officers I know are not guys who are "dog nazis" as you so kindly put it.
    Pretty much, but I figured I shouldn't push my luck, so I didn't respond.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •