That sounds more like RMGO than NRA. NRA opposed the legal strategy in DC v. Heller because they were afraid of a loss at the Supreme Court level sealing a national precedent that can continue to be argued when the state-level precedents conflict. They got onboard when it appeared the legal strategy was a winner. It's unsatisfying but it's smart politics -- and by the way, shopping cases and forums is exactly what the liberals do to us. It's worked fairly well for the liberals until recently -- and is still working for them on other issues.
No argument here but the Boy Scouts and some states mandate NRA certification because it's an easy out legally and financially. They don't have to create their own courses and assume liability for the courses or instructors nor oversee administration of the certifications, just point to a certification source they consider acceptable and require it.
Ummm ... WRONG. First, the NRA's priority in instruction is SAFETY. Second, the rule as taught in class is "always keep the gun unloaded until ready to use." Self-defense and home defense firearms are presumed to be ready-to-use at the owner's discretion so there's no problem keeping them loaded. Third, NRA instruction is to treat every firearm as if it's loaded until proven otherwise. As a certified instructor, you should know these things already so I'm confused by your misstatement.






Reply With Quote
